By Erica Larson
It takes approximately 11 months from conception for a mare to produce a foal—emphasis on the word approximately. Anyone who’s waited up long nights for foals to arrive knows that a mare’s gestation length can vary substantially. While there are various methods caretakers can use to predict foaling, some are more accurate than others. But which is most accurate?
A research team led by Mariana Diel de Amorim, DVM, DVSc, Dipl. ACT, now lecturer in theriogenology at the Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, in Ithaca, New York, recently set out to compare foaling prediction methods. Madonna Morrison, DVM, a recent graduate of the University of Prince Edward Island’s Atlantic Veterinary College, in Canada, presented the results at the 2017 American Association of Equine Practitioners Convention, held Nov. 17-21 in San Antonio, Texas.
The team collected mammary secretions from 40 Standardbred mares starting between Day 320 and Day 330 of gestation and tested several foaling prediction methods, including:
- The calcium titration method (measuring the secretions’ calcium concentrations, which rise significantly from 72 to 24 hours before foaling);
- A digital pH meter (which measures the acidity of secretions; these are normally slightly basic—having a pH above 7—and when they drop to below 7, the mare will likely foal within 24 hours);
- pH test strips (the same concept as using a digital pH meter, but using commercially available test strips);
- Water hardness test strips (measure calcium and magnesium);
- A Brix refractometer (measures colostrum-specific gravity, which rises as mares get closer to foaling); and
- A commercially available foaling monitoring system. Diel de Amorim said the team used Foalert. “It is a transducer that is sewn onto the mare’s vulva lips and, once the foal separates the vulva lips, the transducer sends a signal to the receiver,” she said. The receiver then calls preprogrammed telephone numbers to alert attendants that the mare is foaling.
They analyzed samples from three days (Day -3) before foaling to foaling (Day 0) and found significant differences between the tests on Days -3, -1, and 0. Some key findings:
- “Both the calcium titration and pH methods (seem) to be the best methods” for predicting foaling, said Diel de Amorim;
- The foaling monitoring system alerted the team when 82% of mares were foaling, but it did not alert them about the others; it also produced “false alarms” 19% of the time.
Diel de Amorim said owners and breeding managers can use both the calcium titration and pH methods in the field, in concert with each other.
“The calcium titration method that we used is the FoalWatch,” she said. These tests are fairly easy to use, she said, noting that it can take a few tests to get the hang of how to carry them out.
“The pH is easier to do and cheaper,” Diel de Amorim said. “The pH strip needs to be in 0.2 increments, and you only need a few drops of mammary secretion to perform. You put the strip in the mammary secretion and read the color immediately after. The digital (pH meter) is also easy to perform.”
She said any of the digital pH meters available for aquarium use will work, but you’ll also need a pH solution to ensure the meter is calibrated properly.
Click here to see more...