Farms.com Home   News

Commentary: Sustainability a two-way conversation

As an agriculture consultant who has equity ownership in a large-scale grain farm, I get the benefits of seeing the forest through the trees. This may not make me the most loved professional by all farmers, but it does allow me to step back and provide additional perspectives.

“Sustainability” in agriculture has become a buzzword. And, since it has become a subjective term these days, we must rely on data and analytics to help tell our story.

Here is where we, as an industry, have dropped the ball. As the stewards of the land, we don’t have much from the last three decades to show for it. And please don’t say zero-till — this is as bad of a buzzword as sustainability.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

No-Till vs Tillage: Why Neighboring Fields Are World Apart

Video: No-Till vs Tillage: Why Neighboring Fields Are World Apart

“No-till means no yield.”

“No-till soils get too hard.”

But here’s the real story — straight from two fields, same soil, same region, totally different outcomes.

Ray Archuleta of Kiss the Ground and Common Ground Film lays it out simply:

Tillage is intrusive.

No-till can compact — but only when it’s missing living roots.

Cover crops are the difference-maker.

In one field:

No-till + covers ? dark soil, aggregates, biology, higher organic matter, fewer weeds.

In the other:

Heavy tillage + no covers ? starving soil, low diversity, more weeds, fragile structure.

The truth about compaction?

Living plants fix it.

Living roots leak carbon, build aggregates, feed microbes, and rebuild structure — something steel never can.

Ready to go deeper into the research behind no-till yields, rotations, and profitability?