Farms.com Home   News

Cutting Cleaver Populations with Cultural Control Practices

Herbicides are one tool for managing cleavers in canola, but there are many other “small hammers” in the toolbox as well.
 
Seeding rates, row spacing, control timing, and crop rotation all need to be considered, explains Ian Epp, agronomy specialist with the Canola Council of Canada.
 
“We can add a few of these small things together and have a net drop in cleaver return to the seed bank, which has a net benefit to the grower over the long term,” he says.
 
Cleavers can be a winter annual or a summer annual. Like all weeds, they’re are best controlled with they are small, which means glyphosate in fall and/or pre-seed can be effective, notes Epp. Higher glyphosate rates and tank mixes with other modes of action are also recommended to reduce the odds of developing resistance, while considering many cleavers are Group 2 resistant.
 
In-crop, Epp says they should be controlled early, in the 1-3 whorl stages, which might mean taking the sprayer out twice to control other weeds.
 
“It’s really important for growers, after they’ve planted their canola, to stage their cleavers and control them fairly early,” he says.
 
Since herbicide options are limited and the window for controlling cleavers is tight in canola and pulse crops, he stresses the importance of taking a rotational approach to managing cleaver populations and reducing the cleaver seed bank in cereal crop years.
 
Source : Albertacanola

Trending Video

$400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Video: $400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Officials are forced to defend cutting a historic $3.8 million research farm while the government simultaneously funded an $8.5 million cricket factory that went bankrupt. Is this evidence of an incoherent spending strategy? Watch the full committee clash to see the government's official rationale.

A heated discussion erupts over the logic behind the government's cuts to AAFC research farms in Lacombe, Indian Head, and Quebec City. MPs question why core, decades-old scientific infrastructure is being deemed 'not core' while other, controversial programs were funded. The Deputy Minister is repeatedly pressed for the actual net savings of the decision versus the expense of relocating research programs.