Farm & Food Care Submission re: Environmental Bill of Rights

Jan 28, 2015

The pollinator health issue is complex as pollinators have been shown to be sensitive to a variety of factors in their environment, and more importantly to the cumulative impact of these factors. While the impacts of pesticides are one factor, there are many others factors, particularly in Ontario. These include losses of pollinator habitat and food sources due to factors such as increased land used by urbanization, climate change, changes in beekeeping practices (custom pollination for example), and diseases and pests like the Varroa destructor. Changes in the mix of agricultural crops have had a tremendous influence on the habitat available for pollinators. In 1978, hay and pasture lands represented 35 per cent of Ontario’s farmland. By 2011, hay and pasture represented just three per cent of Ontario’s farmlands and more intensive management of hay and pasture lands (such as cutting clover before it flowers) has removed a once-abundant seasonal food supply for pollinators. If we hope to truly improve pollinator health in the province, we must look at the big picture and take into account the relative impacts of each factor that could contribute negatively or positively to improving pollinator health. Farmers are committed to finding workable, practical solutions to limit exposure of bees and other non-targeted insects to pesticides and encouraging a healthy pollinator population.

Click Here For Detail

Source: Farmfoodcare

Video: Dicamba Returns for Georgia Farmers: What the New EPA Ruling Means for Cotton Growers

After being unavailable in 2024 due to registration issues, dicamba products are returning for Georgia farmers this growing season — but under strict new conditions.

In this report from Tifton, Extension Weed Specialist Stanley Culpepper explains the updated EPA ruling, including new application limits, mandatory training requirements, and the need for a restricted use pesticide license. Among the key changes: a cap of two ½-pound applications per year and the required use of an approved volatility reduction agent with every application.

For Georgia cotton producers, the ruling is significant. According to Taylor Sills with the Georgia Cotton Commission, the vast majority of cotton planted in the state carries the dicamba-tolerant trait — meaning farmers had been paying for technology they couldn’t use.

While environmental groups have expressed concerns over spray drift, Georgia growers have reduced off-target pesticide movement by more than 91% over the past decade. Still, this two-year registration period will come with increased scrutiny, making stewardship and compliance more important than ever.