Farms.com Home   News

U.S. Meat Animal Research Center Creates Across-Breed EPD Adjustment

It’s not apples-to-apples. That old saying sure rings true when trying to compare the expected progeny differences, or E-P-Ds, of bulls from two different breeds. And that’s why the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center Research Geneticist Larry Kuehn analyzes breed differences and provides comparison tools. 
 
"We’ve been releasing the across breed EPD adjustment factors from Clay Center for almost twenty five years now, but this year for the first time we’re including carcass weight as one of the traits that are being analyzed with that, so that commercial producers will have a new tool to compare their animals across breed for another economically relevant trait," Kuehn said. 
 
Changes in cattle marketing helped spur the addition.
 
"I think we’re getting more and more commercial producers that are retaining ownership, so the yearling weight and weaning weight are no longer the economically important traits," Kuehn said. "Now they want to know what they’re getting paid for as their base price on the grid. So, this and marbling and, and, and back fat will all be a good component for them to help sell their cattle better."
 
 
The adjustments are calculated back to an Angus base, and many Extension programs have spreadsheets to help producers make sense of it all. The historical database allows Kuehn and his team to spot trends. 
 
"Over the last few years we’ve, we’ve really continued to see where breeds have been selecting hard," Kuehn said. "Just take Angus for instance. Partly yearling weight, now with carcass weight available have very, very strong trends in growth, making up to a pound and a half to two pounds on average per year, and it’s brought Angus into a competitive position with several of the other continental breeds being equal in yearling weight and equal in carcass weight basically while still maintaining a nice birth weight at the same time."
 
 
Click here to see more...

Trending Video

What Successful AI Implementation Looks Like in the Protein Industry | Ben Allen, CEO of BinSentry

Video: What Successful AI Implementation Looks Like in the Protein Industry | Ben Allen, CEO of BinSentry

In this conversation, Ben Allen, CEO of BinSentry, explores what separates successful AI implementation from early experimentation across the protein industry. As producers begin integrating artificial intelligence into their operations, the most effective implementations share common themes: strong data foundations, practical use cases, and a focus on solving real operational challenges. Ben discusses why data quality and integration are essential for AI to deliver meaningful results, and why technology alone is not enough. Successful adoption also depends heavily on people, training, and company culture, ensuring teams understand how to use new tools and trust the insights they provide. Looking ahead, the conversation highlights the steps protein producers can take today—from improving data infrastructure to embracing digital tools—to position their operations for long-term success in an increasingly AI-driven industry.