Have ‘Ag-Gag Laws’ Gone too Far?

Animal Activists Assault on Agriculture Triggers Gag Laws

By Amanda Brodhagen, Farms.com

The food system is an intimate experience that touches everyone’s lives and it’s important to understand how your food is produced. But lawmakers in the US have introduced new measures to protect the ‘privacy’ of farms. The introduction of ‘ag-gag laws’ prohibits photographing or videotaping on farms without the owners consent. Over 20 states have proposed ag-gag laws with the first ones popping up in the early 1990’s.  US farmers have had their fair share of animal activist groups target their operations, trying to use any piece of evidence as ‘proof’ that  farmers mistreat their animals.

It’s unfortunate that this law had to be created in the first place. Farmers don’t have anything to hide – they care about the animals and are stewards of the land. The rise of ‘radical’ animal activist groups trespassing on farmer’s properties and attempting to gather evidence to support their cause has prompted lawmakers to- put -a -stop to the constant assault on agriculture.

But in rare cases there are cruelties that do happen that tarnish the name for agriculture and in those rare cases when cruelties do happen- it should be exposed. Ag-gag laws are harmful to agriculture because it makes the law look like there is something to hide when really the law is about protecting farm owners from activists who try and trespass on their property. There now exists two extreme sides of the spectrum the – radical animal activists and ag-gag laws. Do ag-ag laws really achieve the purpose that they were originally intended to do?