Determining Outcomes of On-farm Best Practices

By Susan V. Fisk

Baking a cake from scratch has more variables than baking one from a boxed mix. Though one can debate why—and when—cake mixes were developed, they are popular, and produce a uniform product. (They were really patented in the 1930s.)

Scientific research is much like that cake mix—very controlled. Putting recommendations into practice, say from greenhouse and field studies onto the farm, loses some of the control. In this way, practicing farming is more like baking from scratch than baking from a boxed mix.

However, it's important to find out what the results are on those farm fields. Do they yield similar results to what the research suggests?

Emily Oldfield and a team of researchers across the upper Midwest tackled this question. They recently published their results in Soil Science Society of America Journal, a publication of the Soil Science Society of America.

The team specifically was looking at the relationship between soil organic matter and corn yields. They compiled data from 170 corn fields from 49 different farms. The farms were in a network of growers based in Wisconsin and Minnesota.

"Loss of organic matter on farms is a major global issue," says Oldfield. "It is associated with a loss of soil fertility which supports crop growing and yields. It can decrease food security, diminish rural livelihoods and threaten freshwater systems."

In response to these issues, multiple studies have showed a variety of best practices that farmers can implement. They range from no-till to crop rotation to adding manure to soil. All these practices can increase the amount of soil organic matter. The study by Oldfield and her collaborators quantifies how implementing these practices affects both soil organic matter and crop yields on working farms.

"In research fields, scientists can control many variables," says Oldfield. "They can set up plots to minimize the differences in soil type and soil texture (sandy or silty). In greenhouse studies, the temperature and day length can be highly controlled."

But farmers practice out in all the elements. This is why determining the outcomes of using various practices on actual farms is important.

This study showed that, indeed, there is a positive relationship between the amount of soil organic matter and crop yields.

The results regarding the practice of manure application were less clear. This could be due to the timing of manure applications on the different farm fields. "The addition of manure as a readily available organic source of nutrients is clearly important within this regional context," says Oldfield. "It has also been shown to have positive benefits on soil health. Our analysis shows that nitrogen from manure as well as fertilizer and soil organic matter all have strong associations with agricultural productivity in this region."

The study also found that the relationship between crop yields and soil organic matter was different depending on crop rotation. For example, fields planted in continuous corn had, on average, higher soil organic matter contents but lower yields. Corn planted in rotation (corn-soy and corn-oat-alfalfa) resulted in high yields.