Farms.com Home   News

Does Injection Site or Time From Injection of Local Anaesthetic To Castration Reduce Castration Pain? By Dr. Brad DeWolf from South West Ontario Veterinary Services

Surgical castration of piglets continues to be “under the microscope” with respect to animal welfare. Some countries such as Denmark allow surgical castration when a local anaesthetic such as procaine is used as a local anaesthetic. These Danish researchers reported the results of a study that looked at the efficacy and side effects of various volumes of procaine that could be injected into the testicle. This same group of researchers wanted to further investigate the effectiveness of two very specific local anaesthetic injection locations. Intra-funicular and intra-testicular injection of procaine were compared. Intrafunicular injection involves an injection into the spermatic cord or “ funiculus spermaticus” . This is the tubular structure containing vas deferens, arteries, veins and nerves that descend to the testes. It is easier to target the testes for injection but the researchers wanted to know if an injection directly into the spermatic cord would provide improved local anaesthesia for surgical castration. The researchers also wanted to study the impact of various strategies of waiting time between injection and castration. The four time intervals between anaesthetic injection and castration were 2.5, 5, 10, and 30 min. The study involved 597 3 to 4 day old male piglets. The treatments included surgical castration without anesthesia , local anesthesia followed by castration involving all combinations of injection method and interval. As a control they also did “sham handling” separated by the same four intervals. Responses of piglets to drug injection, castration and sham handling were evaluated based on quantification of intra-procedural vocalizations, leg movements and saliva cortisol concentration in samples taken before and after treatments.

The researchers found the following:

  • No differences were found between intrafunicular (spermatic cord) and the simpler intratesticular injection method.
  • Intervals of 2.5 or 30 min led to stronger piglet responses than the other intervals of 5 and 10 minutes.
  • Treatments involving injecting the local anesthetic as well as castration led to significantly stronger responses than sham handling alone. ( No surprise there.)
  • All treatments including sham handling (no injection or castration) led to a significant increase in saliva cortisol with no differences between anesthesia treatments and controls.

Take Home Messages

  • The researchers concluded that castration 5 to 10 min after intra-testicular injection of procaine seems to be the preferred timing.
  • Saliva cortisol was not a very useful tool for parsing out the welfare differences between the various local anaesthetic techniques. This confirms a similar finding in previous research.
  • The researchers further suggested that the overall benefits of injectable local anaesthetic for castration were arguable. Castration with local anaesthesia offers some reduction of pain but does  not eliminate the pain associated with either injection or castration.
Source : Swine Web

Trending Video

What If Everything You Knew About Feed Inventory Was Wrong?

Video: What If Everything You Knew About Feed Inventory Was Wrong?

AI, Agriculture & the Future of Smart Farming with BinSentry CEO Ben Allen. Every day, livestock producers make thousands of dollars' worth of decisions based on one simple question: How much feed is actually left in the bin? For decades, the answer has often been an estimate.

In this episode of AgTech with Andrew, I sit down with Ben Allen, CEO of BinSentry, to explore how artificial intelligence, machine vision and real-time data are transforming one of agriculture's most overlooked challenges—feed and grain inventory management.
We discuss why some of the biggest inefficiencies in livestock production aren't happening in the barn, but throughout the feed supply chain. Ben shares insights from his career leading agricultural technology companies, explains why AI must solve real business problems to earn producer trust, and offers his vision for the connected farm of the future.

In this interview, you'll discover:
Why feed inventory has remained one of agriculture's biggest blind spots
How AI is reducing costly feed outages, waste and unnecessary deliveries
The hidden safety risks of traditional bin inspections
What separates successful ag technologies from those that never gain adoption
How connected farms are changing decision-making for producers, feed mills and integrators
Why real-time inventory may become as important as precision planting and autonomous equipment

Whether you're a livestock producer, grain farmer, feed manufacturer, ag retailer, nutritionist or simply passionate about the future of agriculture, this conversation offers valuable insights into where the industry is headed.