Farms.com Home  › News

Fungicide Considerations For Corn Diseases In 2023

We are entering the time window in Kansas where corn producers should be scouting fields and assessing the need for a foliar fungicide application. Several fields in eastern Kansas are approaching V14-VT (tassel) development stage.

Now is the time to be out scouting for the following fungal diseases of corn:

  1. Southern rust (Figure 1, left)
  2. Common Rust (Figure 1, right)
  3. Gray leaf spot (Figure 2)
  4. Tar Spot (Figure 3)

Figure 1. Typical symptoms of southern rust (left) and common rust (right). Photo courtesy of Rodrigo Borba Onofre, Department of Plant Pathology, K-State Research and Extension.

Figure 1. Typical symptoms of southern rust (left) and common rust (right). Photo courtesy of Rodrigo Borba Onofre, Department of Plant Pathology, K-State Research and Extension.

Southern rust scouting. Southern rust is typically first reported in Kansas in mid-July. Pustules will appear on the upper leaf surface (unlike common rust which can be found on either side of the leaf). Pustules will be scattered on the leaf surface and spores will appear orange and will rub off on fingers (and clothes!). Severe infections can be seen on the leaf sheaths.

Figure 2. Gray leaf spot lesions are rectangular in shape and delimited by leaf veins. Photo courtesy of Rodrigo Onofre, Department of Plant Pathology, K-State Research and Extension.

Figure 2. Gray leaf spot lesions are rectangular in shape and delimited by leaf veins. Photo courtesy of Rodrigo Onofre, Department of Plant Pathology, K-State Research and Extension.

Gray leaf spot scouting. Begin scouting for gray leaf spot in corn about two weeks before expected tassel emergence. Gray leaf spot is characterized by rectangular lesions that are 1-2 inches in length and cover the entire area between the leaf veins. Early lesions are small, necrotic spots with yellow halos that gradually expand to full-sized lesions. Lesions are usually tan in color but may turn gray during foggy or rainy conditions. The key diagnostic feature is that the lesions are usually very rectangular in shape.
Figure 3. Tar spot of corn. Purple arrows are indicating a few of the tar spot lesions. Photo courtesy of Rodrigo Onofre, Department of Plant Pathology, K-State Research and Extension.

Figure 3. Tar spot of corn. Purple arrows are indicating a few of the tar spot lesions. Photo courtesy of Rodrigo Onofre, Department of Plant Pathology, K-State Research and Extension.

Tar spot was detected in Kansas during the 2022 corn season. To date, it has been reported in Atchison, Brown, Doniphan, Jackson, Jefferson, and Nemaha counties in Kansas. Tar spot lesions are black, raised, and have a round/elliptical shape (Figure 3). Irrigated corn may be at particularly high risk for yield or silage loss.

For confirmation of tar spot, please submit samples to the K-State Plant Pathology Diagnostic Clinic at https://www.plantpath.k-state.edu/extension/plant-disease-diagnostic-lab/ 

Factors that influence corn yield response to fungicide applications

Research clearly demonstrates that the single best time to apply a fungicide to corn for gray leaf spot control is from VT to R1. A single application at V6 – V8 will not hold up against late-season pressure. A VT to R1 application may also provide suppression of southern rust and tar spot. Some fungicides that are good to excellent for gray leaf spot are also very good for tar spot and southern rust control. Summaries of multi-year university research about fungicide efficacy can be found here:

https://cropprotectionnetwork.s3.amazonaws.com/CPN2011_FungicideEfficacyControlCornDiseases_04_2022-1650470887.pdf

Disease risk factors to consider when weighing the benefits of a fungicide application

Susceptibility level of corn hybrid. Seed companies typically provide information on the susceptibility of their hybrids to gray leaf spot and southern rust. In general, hybrids that are more susceptible to fungal foliar diseases will have a greater response to a foliar fungicide (if disease pressure is high enough).

Previous crop. Because gray leaf spot and tar spot survives in corn residue, the risk of disease increases when corn is planted back into a field that was in corn the previous year. Fields with a history of gray leaf spot and tar spot should be closely scouted. Southern rust, on the other hand, blows in from the south each year. It is important to watch regional updates about southern rust pressure in the state.

Weather. Rainy and/or humid weather generally is most favorable to gray leaf spot. In growing seasons when these conditions prevail, the risk for disease development increases. Southern rust is favored by warm days and nights (> 80 degrees) as well as high humidity. Tar spot is favored by mild temperature (60F to 73F), high relative humidity (>75%), and a prolonged leaf wetness period (>7h).

Field history. Some field locations may have a history of high foliar disease severity. Fields in river bottoms or low areas or surrounded by trees may be more prone to having gray leaf spot.

Current disease management guidelines suggest the following criteria for considering an application of foliar fungicide.

  • For susceptible hybrids (those with the lowest rating within a company’s lineup): Fungicide applications should be considered if disease symptoms are present on the third leaf below the ear or higher on 50 percent of the plants examined.
  • For intermediate hybrids (those with an average rating within a company’s lineup): Fungicide applications should be considered if disease symptoms are present on the third leaf below the ear or higher on 50 percent of the plants examined if the field is in an area with a history of foliar disease problems, the previous crop was corn, there is 35 percent or more surface residue, and the weather is warm and humid.
  • For resistant hybrids (those with the best rating within a company’s lineup): Fungicide applications generally are not recommended.
     

According to the data from Illinois corn fungicide trials, if at least 5 percent of the ear leaf area is affected by disease at the end of the season, a foliar fungicide applied at VT and R1 would likely have been beneficial. Using the disease risk factors and scouting observations collected just before tassel emergence will help predict how severe disease pressure may be several weeks after the VT to R1 stages, and help decide whether to apply a foliar fungicide.
If no disease is present or pressure is low, I recommend holding off on the R1 application since efficacy will begin to wane in three to four weeks, just as late-season pressure may begin to develop. Data exists that would suggest that if disease pressure begins to develop later, an R2 application can be economical and will provide protection later into the grain fill period. This later application could also protect against any late-season southern rust pressure.

Distinguishing between gray leaf spot and bacterial streak

Bacterial streak, identified as a new corn disease in the U.S. in 2016, is now active in most of western Kansas. While yield loss potential for this disease remains unknown, we do know that it can be misidentified as gray leaf spot, resulting in unwarranted fungicide applications. Fungicides will not have any effect on bacterial streak. Keep in mind that gray leaf spot typically has very sharp edges defined by the leaf veins, whereas bacterial streak will have a wavy edge that can cross the leaf vein (Figure 4). Also, when backlit with light, gray leaf spot lesions will have an opaque appearance while bacterial streak lesions are more translucent (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Comparison of sharp-edged gray leaf spot lesions (right) with wavy-edged bacterial streak lesions (left). Photo courtesy of the University of Nebraska.
Figure 4. Comparison of sharp-edged gray leaf spot lesions (right) with wavy-edged bacterial streak lesions (left). Photo courtesy of the University of Nebraska.

Source : ksu.edu

Trending Video

The 15-Year Bet Behind Every New Variety

Video: The 15-Year Bet Behind Every New Variety!



Canada is trying to decide how much agricultural research capacity it can afford to lose. Brian Rossnagel believes the better question is whether the country can afford to rebuild it.

The longtime barley and oat breeder makes the case with a simple fact about his profession: the consequences of today’s decisions may not become visible for 10 or 15 years.

“Pick the right parents. That’s the biggest thing,” Rossnagel says. “If you pick the wrong parents, you’re not going to get anywhere—and you don’t know that until 10 years, 15 years later.”

That warning carries particular weight as Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada moves to reduce spending and streamline parts of its science operations. The department’s 2026–27 plan anticipates the loss of approximately 665 positions by 2028–29 and says some research will be reduced where capacity exists in academia or industry. AAFC says the changes will make its science operations more cost-effective over the long term.

For Canada’s seed industry, Rossnagel’s career illustrates what is at stake.

This fall, the retired University of Saskatchewan breeder will be inducted into the Canadian Agricultural Hall of Fame. During his 35-year career at the Crop Development Centre, he helped develop more than 100 barley and oat varieties, including CDC Austenson—one of Western Canada’s most widely grown feed barleys. His induction recognizes not only those varieties, but the collaboration and research system that made them possible.

Rossnagel is quick to emphasize that none of it was the work of one person.

“The first thing I thought about was all the other people who contributed to whatever success I and my program had over the years,” he says. “We know that it’s not an individual who does this. It’s a group—a team.”

That team extends well beyond the breeder whose name appears beside a variety. It includes technicians, pathologists, quality specialists, statisticians, regional testing sites, seed growers and industry partners. It also includes the breeders who came before and those who will carry the germplasm forward.

CDC Fraser barley, for example, moved through three breeding careers. Its parents came from Brian Harvey’s program. Rossnagel advanced the material after Harvey retired, and Aaron Beattie later guided it through registration and release.

That kind of handoff is normal in plant breeding. The person who makes the original cross may never see the resulting variety reach farmers.

It also explains why lost research capacity cannot simply be switched back on when budgets improve.

“If you shut it off, it’s very, very difficult—and particularly costly—to start it up again,” Rossnagel says. “If you have to start from scratch, it’s going to be at least 10 years before anybody notices whether you’re getting anything done or not.”

The concern is not simply how many experimental lines Canada can process. Modern equipment, statistical tools and genetic technologies allow today’s breeding programs to evaluate tens of thousands of lines—far more than Rossnagel could handle when he entered the field in the early 1970s.

But efficiency and automation do not generate every idea.

“If you pare back down, and instead of having six or seven individual scientists concentrating on wheat breeding, you go down and say three people could handle all this, well, that’s half the ideas gone,” he says. “Particularly if you happen to lose the three people who had the really neat and innovative ideas, boy, that’s a problem.”

It is a timely distinction for Canadian agriculture. Consolidating programs may preserve the volume of material moving through a system, at least initially. It may not preserve the diversity of thinking, regional knowledge or willingness to pursue unconventional crosses.

That regional knowledge matters because Canadian agriculture is not one uniform production environment. A variety suited to southern Alberta may face different disease, moisture and maturity pressures than one grown in Manitoba, Ontario or Atlantic Canada.

“Agriculture is applied biology,” Rossnagel says. “Biology, all around the Earth, moves from the poles to the equator. It does not move from Newfoundland to B.C. like politics do.”