Farms.com Home   Ag Industry News

Lambton Cattlemen’s Association preparing community pastures presentation

Lambton Cattlemen’s Association preparing community pastures presentation
Mar 18, 2025
By Diego Flammini
Assistant Editor, North American Content, Farms.com

The organization will present in front of the St. Clair Region Conservation Authority in April

A local Ontario livestock organization will be making its case for a community pasture next month.

The Lambton Cattlemen’s Association will make a presentation to the St. Clair Region Conservation Authority on April 17 about turning about 200 of 600 available acres into a community pasture.

“These are lands that are in south Lambton over by Wilkesport,” Chad Anderson, president of the local cattlemen’s group, told Farms.com.

Ontario has 11 community pastures and related organizational groups.

Together, they form the Ontario Association of Community Pastures.

The Leeds Community Pasture Association, for example, owns and manages a 1,500-acre property near Soperton that supports up to 25 producers.

The Lambton Cattlemen’s Association is preparing a business plan for its project.

The plan will include information like the grasses for the pasture and who is responsible for seeding and care. The documents will also include environmental and habitat management information.

If the cattlemen’s group is successful with its pitch, it will become a member of the provincial organization and would be required to come up with its own bylaws and other rules.

This would provide certain insurance and administrative benefits.

“It’s a lot of work but it’s very exciting,” Anderson said.

The work on community pastures started last year.

At its 2024 AGM, Beef Farmers of Ontario passed a resolution to work with Conservation Ontario and local conservation authorities to find available leasable land for community pastures.

And this February, the Lambton Cattlemen’s Association held a meeting to vet interest in the project.

The turnout suggested farmers in the community want and need access to this land for multiple reasons.

“We could probably fill this community pasture four times over,” Anderson said. “It’s important because we’d like it to include all the land at some point, but that’s a long way away. We’re in an area with intensive row crop production and we’ve lost vast amounts of pastureland in the last 20 years.”

For context, the 2012 Census of Agriculture estimates Ontario loses about 319 acres of farmland each day.

Another reason for the community pasture is to support younger producers. In this context, a young farmer is someone under 40, Anderson said.


Trending Video

Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Video: Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG emissions) in the Canadian swine sector found that CH4 emissions from manure were the largest contributor to the overall emissions, followed by emissions from energy use and crop production.

This innovative project, "Improving Swine Manure-Digestate Management Practices Towards Carbon Neutrality With Net Zero Emission Concepts," from Dr. Rajinikanth Rajagopal, under Swine Cluster 4, seeks to develop strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

While the management of manure can be very demanding and expensive for swine operations, it can also be viewed as an opportunity for GHG mitigation, as manure storage is an emission source built and managed by swine producers. Moreover, the majority of CH4 emissions from manure occur during a short period of time in the summer, which can potentially be mitigated with targeted intervention.

In tandem with understanding baseline emissions, Dr. Rajagopal's work focuses on evaluating emission mitigation options. Manure additives have the potential of reducing manure methane emissions. Additives can be deployed relatively quickly, enabling near-term emission reductions while biodigesters are being built. Furthermore, additives can be a long-term solution at farms where biogas is not feasible (e.g., when it’s too far from a central digester). Similarly, after biodigestion, additives can also be used to further reduce emissions from storage to minimize the carbon intensity of the bioenergy.