Farms.com Home   News

K-State Vets Caution Producers About Stressed Plants, Pasture Toxins

K-State Vets Caution Producers About Stressed Plants, Pasture Toxins

By Lisa Moser

Ask anyone who’s had a bout with food poisoning and most will be able to cite the trigger food. Often, they will never knowingly eat that food again.

Much like with humans, beef cattle can also experience sickness and even death when grazing pastures that have plants undergoing stress and releasing toxins such as cyanide and nitrates, said Kansas State University clinical veterinary toxicologist Steve Ensley on a recent Cattle Chat podcast.

“There are two plant-related issues we see depending on the weather and the environment — cyanide toxicosis from prussic acid and nitrate poisoning,” Ensley said.

With cyanide, the cattle will show acute clinical signs as soon as 30 minutes after consuming toxic plants, according to Ensley. Those signs include trouble breathing and a change in their movement; in some cases, the first visible sign is death.

If producers observe these symptoms, Ensley said cattle need to be pulled from the feed source immediately to keep the poisoning from impacting other cattle in the herd. He also said a blood sample from the vein of the animal can show what type of toxin the cattle have consumed.

“If the blood is chocolate brown, that indicates a nitrate poisoning, while blood that is cherry red points to cyanide. In some cases both toxins are at work at the same time,” Ensley said.

Aside from removing cattle from the grazing source there is little that veterinarians can do to reduce the risk of death once the cattle have consumed the toxins, said Ensley.

However, being aware of the risk can be helpful, said Brad White, a veterinarian with the Beef Cattle Institute.

“A plant that is stressed can release these toxins, so it is important to monitor the field conditions and if the plants are turning yellow on the leaves that can be a sign of stress,” White said. “Another time the plant experiences stress is after the first frost.”

Ensley added that sorghum-sudan grass and Johnsongrass are two examples of plants that are more prone to making cattle sick.

There are some management strategies that can be helpful, said the experts.

“If you green chop it and feed it immediately the cattle should be able to consume it fine; however, if you put it in the wagon and feed it the next day, the level of cyanide in the plant will be at its peak and could kill them if they ate it,” Ensley said.

He also said the regrowth in pastures often carries more concentrated levels of cyanide and so after a rain the cattle will want to eat the new growth. That can lead to trouble.

Fields that have been treated with nitrogen fertilizer and then cut for hay can be troublesome to cattle if the nitrogen concentration is too high.

“If you bale the hay and mechanically crimp it, some of the toxins like cyanide will be released in that process,” Ensley said. He also recommended ensiling the feed source as it will typically decrease the nitrates by one-third. 

When in doubt, Ensley and White recommend testing the feed sources to get the nutrient profile before feeding.

 “I don’t recommend just putting the cattle out there to see what happens without knowing what they are consuming as it could have a bad outcome,” Ensley said.

To hear the full discussion, listen to the Beef Cattle Institute Cattle Chat podcast online.

 

Source : k-state.edu

Trending Video

Wheat Yields in USA and China Threatened by Heat Waves Breaking Enzymes

Video: Wheat Yields in USA and China Threatened by Heat Waves Breaking Enzymes

A new peer reviewed study looks at the generally unrecognized risk of heat waves surpassing the threshold for enzyme damage in wheat.

Most studies that look at crop failure in the main food growing regions (breadbaskets of the planet) look at temperatures and droughts in the historical records to assess present day risk. Since the climate system has changed, these historical based risk analysis studies underestimate the present-day risks.

What this new research study does is generate an ensemble of plausible scenarios for the present climate in terms of temperatures and precipitation, and looks at how many of these plausible scenarios exceed the enzyme-breaking temperature of 32.8 C for wheat, and exceed the high stress yield reducing temperature of 27.8 C for wheat. Also, the study considers the possibility of a compounded failure with heat waves in both regions simultaneously, this greatly reducing global wheat supply and causing severe shortages.

Results show that the likelihood (risk) of wheat crop failure with a one-in-hundred likelihood in 1981 has in today’s climate become increased by 16x in the USA winter wheat crop (to one-in-six) and by 6x in northeast China (to one-in-sixteen).

The risks determined in this new paper are much greater than that obtained in previous work that determines risk by analyzing historical climate patterns.

Clearly, since the climate system is rapidly changing, we cannot assume stationarity and calculate risk probabilities like we did traditionally before.

We are essentially on a new planet, with a new climate regime, and have to understand that everything is different now.