Farms.com Home   News

FDA CVM Attempting To Clarify Ear Implant Labels For Reimplant Use

FDA CVM Attempting To Clarify Ear Implant Labels For Reimplant Use

By Jerad Jaborek

As of August 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Veterinary Medicine (FDA CVM) has been working to improve the consistency of new animal drug applications (NADA). The FDA CVM has recognized that some anabolic cattle ear implants may not have clear instructions on the label regarding their use for reimplanting within a production phase. The FDA CVM has issued two letters, one in May of 2021 and another in December of 2021, to inform the beef industry of their attempt to clarify reimplantation claims on cattle implant labels. 

Currently, there are cattle implant labels that state the cattle implants are intended for reimplantation and there are cattle implant labels that state the cattle implants are not intended for reimplantation within a production phase. At this time however, there are other cattle implants that do not specify on the label whether reimplantation is approved. The FDA CVM has set a June 2023 deadline for cattle implant manufacturers to update the labels on their cattle implants to clarify their reimplantation approval within a production phase. Therefore, after June 2023, the FDA CVM expects cattle implant labels to indicate the approval of use for reimplantation within a particular production phase and for cattle producers to follow the instructions on the label. 

What does this all mean? 

First, the labels on cattle implants should clearly state if it is approved for reimplantation in a production phase by June 2023, so cattle producers can follow the label’s instructions. Implant labels should provide instructions for which production phase the implant is approved for (e.g., the “beef calf” phase, the “growing beef steers/heifers on pasture” phase, the “growing beef steers/heifers in a dry lot” phase, the “growing beef steers/heifers fed in confinement for slaughter” phase). The FDA CVM has definitions of these different production phases on their website. Below is a bulleted list of some of the production phases involving younger cattle that are typically raised for beef production.

Beef cattle production phases 

  • Dairy calves 
    • Calves fed milk until weaning (pre-ruminating). 
  • Beef calves 
    • Calves nursing their dams and less than two months of age (pre-ruminating). 
    • Calves nursing their dams and greater than two months of age (ruminating). 
  • Beef steers/heifers (includes both beef and dairy breeds) 
    • Growing beef steers/heifers on pasture (e.g., stockers). 
    • Growing beef steers/heifers in a dry lot (e.g., backgrounders). 
    • Growing beef steers/heifers fed in confinement for slaughter (e.g., feedlot cattle). 

If the cattle implant you choose to use is not labeled for reimplant use, it may still be used again during a subsequent production phase if approved for that production phase. If the cattle implant is labeled with approval for reimplantation, that means you can readminister the cattle implant within that approved production phase. 

Source : msu.edu

Trending Video

Sweetener Effects on Gut Health - Dr. Kwangwook Kim

Video: Sweetener Effects on Gut Health - Dr. Kwangwook Kim



In this episode of The Swine Nutrition Blackbelt Podcast, Dr. Kwangwook Kim, Assistant Professor at Michigan State University, discusses the use of non-nutritive sweeteners in nursery pig diets. He explains how sucralose and neotame influence feed intake, gut health, metabolism, and the frequency of diarrhea compared to antibiotics. The conversation highlights mechanisms beyond palatability, including hormone signaling and nutrient transport. Listen now on all major platforms!

“Receptors responsible for sweet taste are present not only in the mouth but also along the intestinal tract.”

Meet the guest: Dr. Kwangwook Kim / kwangwook-kim is an Assistant Professor at Michigan State University, specializing in swine nutrition and feed additives under disease challenge models. He earned his M.S. and Ph.D. in Animal Sciences from the University of California, Davis, where he focused on intestinal health and metabolic responses in pigs. His research evaluates alternatives to antibiotics, targeting gut health and performance in nursery pigs.