Farms.com Home   Ag Industry News

Hope Wheat Changed Global Farming

Hope Wheat Changed Global Farming
Dec 18, 2025
By Farms.com

How one South Dakota breeder transformed wheat disease resistance worldwide

In the early 1900s, wheat farmers across the United States faced severe losses from stem rust, a disease that destroyed crops just before harvest. One South Dakota plant breeder, Edgar McFadden, dedicated his life to finding a solution that would protect wheat and secure food supplies. 

McFadden’s motivation began in his childhood when a rust outbreak ruined his family’s wheat crop. Years later, while studying plant breeding, he noticed that a grain called emmer wheat showed strong resistance to rust but lacked good yield qualities. Most scientists believed emmer could not be crossed with common bread wheat due to genetic differences. However, McFadden continued experimenting despite widespread doubt. 

Through careful crossbreeding, McFadden successfully combined emmer with a popular wheat variety. After years of patient testing and personal financial risk, he developed a new wheat type called Hope. While Hope did not produce the highest yields on its own, it showed strong resistance to both stem and leaf rust and could easily be bred with other high-yielding wheat varieties. 

The release of Hope marked a turning point in agricultural history. Breeders across the country used Hope’s genetics to develop stronger and more productive wheat varieties. By the time World War II began, wheat varieties containing Hope genetics were widely planted across the United States, including much of California. 

These improved varieties allowed farmers to grow billions of bushels of wheat with fewer losses from disease. Historians credit Hope with helping strengthen food supplies during the war and supporting Allied nations during a critical period. 

McFadden remained humble throughout his life and focused on recognizing the work of earlier scientists. Today, his legacy continues as modern wheat varieties still carry Hope’s genetic material. His work remains a powerful example of how agricultural innovation can change the world. 

Photo Credit: gettyimages-ianchrisgraham


Trending Video

$400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Video: $400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Officials are forced to defend cutting a historic $3.8 million research farm while the government simultaneously funded an $8.5 million cricket factory that went bankrupt. Is this evidence of an incoherent spending strategy? Watch the full committee clash to see the government's official rationale.

A heated discussion erupts over the logic behind the government's cuts to AAFC research farms in Lacombe, Indian Head, and Quebec City. MPs question why core, decades-old scientific infrastructure is being deemed 'not core' while other, controversial programs were funded. The Deputy Minister is repeatedly pressed for the actual net savings of the decision versus the expense of relocating research programs.