Farms.com Home   Ag Industry News

Preventing feather pecking in enriched housing

Preventing feather pecking in enriched housing

Researchers work on solutions

 

By Jonathan Martin
Staff Writer
Farms.com

As farmers transition to alternative hen housing, researchers from the University of Guelph are looking into the prominence of feather pecking in the new environments.

In conventional cages, hens often nip at each other’s feathers, damaging feather cover and making it difficult for a bird to regulate its body temperature and maneuver around its environment. Missing feathers also mark hens as targets for further attacks. Feather pecking occurs in all type of chicken enclosures, from conventional cages, to free-run facilities, to free-range farms.

The researchers’ work revealed that 22 per cent of birds suffered “moderate or severe” feather damage from pecking in the new, enriched housing. This type of housing will be standard, along with free-run aviaries and free-range farms, by 2036, Egg Farmers of Canada said.

The study’s lead researcher, Nienke Vaan Staaveren, wants to help farmers who are making the transition between housing types develop tools to manage feather pecking in the new environments, she told Farms.com.

“The earlier you can intervene, the better,” she said. “In terms of specific factors, it will depend on the flock, but the importance of providing foraging opportunities is consistently highlighted in the research, so that is a good start.”

Chickens are driven to forage by instinct, so they’ll look for something to peck if their enclosure has no substrate, Vaan Staaveren said. Sometimes, they find other chickens to be an attractive alternative.

Midnight feedings lead to higher rates of feather pecking, too, the scientists found. Flipping on an enclosure’s lights at night may lead to an increase in calcium consumption, but sleepy chickens make good targets for their wakeful roommates.

Often, the reasons chickens begin pecking at each other are interlinked with the fowl’s genetics and magnified by the birds’ stress or frustration.

“As there are individual variations between birds, there is no real one-solution-fits-all and all flocks respond differently” to management practices, Vaan Staaveren said. “The most effective way to approach feather pecking is to try and address as many of the risk factors (as possible) at the same time and try to minimize any stress the birds may experience.”


Trending Video

Advancing Swine Disease Traceability: USDA's No-Cost RFID Tag Program for Market Channels

Video: Advancing Swine Disease Traceability: USDA's No-Cost RFID Tag Program for Market Channels

On-demand webinar, hosted by the Meat Institute, experts from the USDA, National Pork Board (NPB) and Merck Animal Health introduced the no-cost 840 RFID tag program—a five-year initiative supported through African swine fever (ASF) preparedness efforts. Beginning in Fall 2025, eligible sow producers, exhibition swine owners and State Animal Health Officials can order USDA-funded RFID tags through Merck A2025-10_nimal Health.

NPB staff also highlighted an additional initiative, funded by USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Veterinary Services through NPB, that helps reduce the cost of transitioning to RFID tags across the swine industry and strengthens national traceability efforts.

Topics Covered:

•USDA’s RFID tag initiative background and current traceability practices

•How to access and order no-cost 840 RFID tags

•Equipment support for tag readers and panels

•Implementation timelines for market and cull sow channels How RFID improves ASF preparedness an