Farms.com Home   News

Canadian grain customers provide key information for future crop development

Canadian grain customers like the quality and consistency of our crops.

The Canadian Grain Commission (CGC) provides customers with statements of assurance and letters of analysis.

Derek Bunkowsky,  the CGC's chief grain inspector says statements of assurance are based on cargo monitoring on all bulk vessels of grain that are leaving Canada.

"We are looking at pesticide residue levels, mycotoxin levels, as well as heavy metals. These are all very important things to customers of Canadian grain and by us doing that monitoring and showing and demonstrating that the grain is meeting the regulatory requirements of the country on all of those things, it provides the assurance that those customers are seeking."

He says statements of assurance are an integral piece that allows that transaction to take place between exporters and importers of Canadian grain.

Cereals Canada and the Canadian Grain Commission meet with Canadian grain customers regularly to discuss crop quality and performance.

The Manager of End Products for Cereals Canada, Lindsay Bourre says they share that feedback with breeders that are working on developing new varieties.

"Customers are usually very open and happy to share what is working for them when it comes to Canadian wheat, or if they're encountering any issues or have any concerns."

She notes each year staff take part in the Prairie Grain Development Committee (PGDC) meetings where new breeding lines are brought forward by breeders for testing and evaluation, with the hopes of it being recommended for registration.

Bunkowsky says the Canadian Grain Commission is also actively involved in the PGDC meetings.

"Both our grading system and our variety registration system in Canada are integral pieces that allow Canada to deliver the quality and the functionality that our customers are looking for. So in terms of variety registration, CFIA registers the varieties, but ultimately it's the CGC that determines which varieties are going to be designated to the certain classes."

The PGDC meetings involve four independent recommending committees which are responsible for recommending grain crop candidate cultivars for registration in Western Canada:

Those committees are the Prairie Recommending Committee for Wheat, Rye, and Triticale (PRCWRT), the Prairie Recommending Committee for Oat and Barley (PRCOB), the Prairie Recommending Committee for Pulse & Special Crops (PRCPSC), and the Prairie Recommending Committee for Oilseeds (PRCO).

This year the Prairie Grain Development Committee meetings are being held February 27th to 29th in Saskatoon.

Source : Pembinavalley online

Trending Video

Wheat Yields in USA and China Threatened by Heat Waves Breaking Enzymes

Video: Wheat Yields in USA and China Threatened by Heat Waves Breaking Enzymes

A new peer reviewed study looks at the generally unrecognized risk of heat waves surpassing the threshold for enzyme damage in wheat.

Most studies that look at crop failure in the main food growing regions (breadbaskets of the planet) look at temperatures and droughts in the historical records to assess present day risk. Since the climate system has changed, these historical based risk analysis studies underestimate the present-day risks.

What this new research study does is generate an ensemble of plausible scenarios for the present climate in terms of temperatures and precipitation, and looks at how many of these plausible scenarios exceed the enzyme-breaking temperature of 32.8 C for wheat, and exceed the high stress yield reducing temperature of 27.8 C for wheat. Also, the study considers the possibility of a compounded failure with heat waves in both regions simultaneously, this greatly reducing global wheat supply and causing severe shortages.

Results show that the likelihood (risk) of wheat crop failure with a one-in-hundred likelihood in 1981 has in today’s climate become increased by 16x in the USA winter wheat crop (to one-in-six) and by 6x in northeast China (to one-in-sixteen).

The risks determined in this new paper are much greater than that obtained in previous work that determines risk by analyzing historical climate patterns.

Clearly, since the climate system is rapidly changing, we cannot assume stationarity and calculate risk probabilities like we did traditionally before.

We are essentially on a new planet, with a new climate regime, and have to understand that everything is different now.