Farms.com Home   News

Don’t force farmers to reduce fertilizer use, federal committee urges

OTTAWA — Farmers should not be forced to reduce fertilizer use if that reduces yield, argues a report released this month by the House of Commons Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food.

The 57-page report titled Feeding the World: Strengthening Canada’s Capacity to Respond to Global Food Insecurity includes 22 recommendations and highlights in its summary that the United Nations has warned that the world is “moving backwards” in its efforts to end world hunger and malnutrition.

Recommendation 10 urges Canada to “Recognize that Canadian agricultural producers are leading the world in the efficient use of fertilizers and that it not proceed with any mandatory fertilizer emissions reduction policy that would jeopardize farmer’s yields, but instead encourage them to implement best nutrient management practices such as the 4R program.”

As part of his 2020 climate plan, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau introduced a voluntary goal for farmers to reduce emissions from fertilizer use by 30% by the end of this decade. Critics are skeptical, arguing that volunteers will be hard to find. They also point to a 2021 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada draft discussion paper, retrieved by True North news website in an access to information request, that supports policy options if farmers don’t volunteer. “A suite of policy approaches will be necessary, and consideration to be given to a regulatory backstop should voluntary approaches not be successful,” the federal government document states. The climate goal can be achieved by a more persuasive “regulatory backstop” that goes “beyond” a voluntary agreement, the government document says.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

Dicamba Returns for Georgia Farmers: What the New EPA Ruling Means for Cotton Growers

Video: Dicamba Returns for Georgia Farmers: What the New EPA Ruling Means for Cotton Growers

After being unavailable in 2024 due to registration issues, dicamba products are returning for Georgia farmers this growing season — but under strict new conditions.

In this report from Tifton, Extension Weed Specialist Stanley Culpepper explains the updated EPA ruling, including new application limits, mandatory training requirements, and the need for a restricted use pesticide license. Among the key changes: a cap of two ½-pound applications per year and the required use of an approved volatility reduction agent with every application.

For Georgia cotton producers, the ruling is significant. According to Taylor Sills with the Georgia Cotton Commission, the vast majority of cotton planted in the state carries the dicamba-tolerant trait — meaning farmers had been paying for technology they couldn’t use.

While environmental groups have expressed concerns over spray drift, Georgia growers have reduced off-target pesticide movement by more than 91% over the past decade. Still, this two-year registration period will come with increased scrutiny, making stewardship and compliance more important than ever.