Farms.com Home   News

Federal Aid for Farmers Aims to Offset Losses on Farms. Will It Help?

By Jess Savage

The one-time payments could offer short-term support as many farmers grapple with less income and extreme weather.

U.S. farmers will receive about $31 billion in economic and disaster relief payments in the coming months.

About $21 billion is for disaster relief, which will mostly go toward recovering economic losses from natural disasters that occurred in 2023 and 2024. The funds will be distributed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

And $10 billion in economic relief payments will go mainly to farmers who grow corn, soy and wheat. The one-time payments will be calculated using a per-acre formula, and must be distributed before the end of March.

Texas, Illinois and Iowa are among the states that could receive the most funding, according to an estimate from the University of Missouri.

Farmers can use the money to catch up or prepare for the next season, said Jennifer Ifft, a professor and agricultural policy specialist with the Kansas State University Extension.

“Maybe you can repay some of [an] operating loan so you don't have to take on undesirable levels of debt.” she said. “Maybe you can prepay some of your expenses for next year, because the sooner you pay, usually you can get a better rate... Maybe you just want to save some cash. Maybe you just want to save it.”

Lawmakers passed the funding in December alongside another extension of the 2018 Farm Bill. The massive legislation funds programs like crop insurance and food benefits, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

It was the second time legislators extended the five-year bill, which was passed before the COVID-19 pandemic, a major trade war and inflation impacted the U.S. and global economies.

The relief payments are meant to close the gap between the support farmers receive through the farm bill and the current economic landscape. Prices for inputs like seed, fertilizer and pesticides have remained high, while crop prices have declined since record highs in 2022.

Fifth-generation Kansas farmer Matt Splitter has been feeling this squeeze, on top of drought in the state. In some areas of his fields, he’s only been able to harvest 15% or less of the crops he was expecting. Crop insurance just doesn’t go far enough in these situations, he said.

“I wouldn't say that it's dire for us on our operation that these payments will get us through to the next year,” Splitter said “But what it will help us really put a band aid, or put a plug, in the gap of just not having a whole crop with costs and expenses remaining high – again, something that we can't control.”

Still, the economic relief might not be enough to help farmers break even, according to an agriculture report from the University of Illinois.

Factoring in the financial support from the payments, farmers growing corn and soybeans in central Illinois could still lose between $23 and $118 per acre. The economists are projecting that some farmers in the region who grow an even split of the crops would lose $71 per acre, which is historically low.

Short-term support

The relief funding is considered ad hoc assistance, which are one-time payments authorized by the government. Ad hoc payments have been used multiple times since 2018 to supplement aid from the farm bill, Ifft said.

“So, this $31 billion is not unprecedented,” Ifft said. “We've been seeing this increasing reliance on programs that come from outside of the farm bill since 2018.”

The farm bill is a highly partisan piece of legislation that lawmakers have been trying – unsuccessfully – to update since the 2018 bill first expired in 2023.

Patrick Westhoff, the director of the Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute at the University of Missouri , said that it’s hard to pass the farm bill. New dollars have to come from somewhere else in the federal budget or lawmakers have to increase the deficit – both of which are politically unpopular.

In the case of ad hoc payments, the administration can unlock emergency funding that doesn’t have to be offset or impact the deficit.

Many agriculture groups have emphasized that farmers need a new farm bill. Ryan Whitehouse, the director of national legislation at the Illinois Farm Bureau, said it’s a top legislative priority for the group, which represents 400,000 farmers in the state.

“Farmers are working in a 2025 economy with policies that were created in 2018... So it will be a full court press to get a farm bill done sooner rather than later,” Whitehouse said.

This growing season

The relief payments will likely also benefit banks and lenders, the University of Missouri’s Westhoff said.

Most farmers take out a loan every season to purchase their inputs. Because many are making less money than recent years, lenders could worry that farmers are less likely to pay back their loans, Westhoff said. These payments can offer a bit of relief, he said.

“We've heard from lots of lenders that this was indeed a spring [season] they were very concerned about, and they were hoping to see something to change the dynamic,” Westhoff said.

Back in central Kansas, Matt Splitter empathizes that these payments could be a lifeline for other young farmers who might have been devastated by drought or recent hurricanes.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

Spring 2026 weather outlook for Wisconsin; What an early-arriving El Niño could mean

Video: Spring 2026 weather outlook for Wisconsin; What an early-arriving El Niño could mean

Northeast Wisconsin is a small corner of the world, but our weather is still affected by what happens across the globe.

That includes in the equatorial Pacific, where changes between El Niño and La Niña play a role in the weather here -- and boy, have there been some abrupt changes as of late.

El Niño and La Niña are the two phases of what is collectively known as the El Niño Southern Oscillation, or ENSO for short. These are the swings back and forth from unusually warm to unusually cold sea surface temperatures in the Pacific Ocean along the equator.

Since this past September, we have been in a weak La Niña, which means water temperatures near the Eastern Pacific equator have been cooler than usual. That's where we're at right now.

Even last fall, the long-term outlook suggested a return to neutral conditions by spring and potentially El Niño conditions by summer.

But there are some signs this may be happening faster than usual, which could accelerate the onset of El Niño.

Over the last few weeks, unusually strong bursts of westerly winds farther west in the Pacific -- where sea surface temperatures are warmer than average -- have been observed. There is a chance that this could accelerate the warming of those eastern Pacific waters and potentially push us into El Niño sooner than usual.

If we do enter El Nino by spring -- which we'll define as the period of March, April and May -- there are some long-term correlations with our weather here in Northeast Wisconsin.

Looking at a map of anomalously warm weather, most of the upper Great Lakes doesn't show a strong correlation, but in general, the northern tiers of the United States do tend to lean to that direction.

The stronger correlation is with precipitation. El Niño conditions in spring have historically come with a higher risk of very dry weather over that time frame, so this will definitely be a transition we'll have to watch closely as we move out of winter.