Farms.com Home   News

Feds Continue To Insist On Cutting Fertilizer Emissions

Canada's top ag minister says there's a lot of miscommunications when it comes to Ottawa's plan to cut emissions from fertilizers this decade.

Marie Claude Bibeau says the target is to cut emissions by 30 percent by 2030. She says it's not about forcing farmers to cut back on the amount of fertilizer they use, but many groups say it still means a threat to the business of farming. It also angers many groups that the federal government seems so out of touch with producers given that many have been cutting back on fertilizer use for decades without getting any credit for that work.

The Western Wheat Growers launched an online petition this week they hope people outside of farming will sign. Stephen Vandervalk, the wheat growers vice president is not convinced by the minister's assurances, this is only about emissions. "Agriculture is 97 percent family farm, and why, because corporate farming has failed every single time, returns aren't there. We work on under 2 percent returns on investment. We spend a generation paying off our investment. We've gotten our efficiencies to the point of absolutely ridiculousness. For the government to say we need to do more, it shows you how out of touch they are. For us to have nitrous oxide emissions means we're losing fertilizer. If we're losing fertilizer, our number one expense, we're out of business. We have fixed that decades ago and the government just says 'no we're not giving you any credit for that'. We have a 2020 net reduction number. For farmers to meet that, it's absolutely fertilizer reduction."

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

How Can We Grow More Food With Less Impact?

Video: How Can We Grow More Food With Less Impact?

For over two decades, Dr. Mitloehner has been at the forefront of research on how animal agriculture affects our air and our climate. With deep expertise in emissions and volatile organic compounds, his work initially focused on air quality in regions like California’s Central Valley—home to both the nation’s richest agricultural output and some of its poorest air quality.

In recent years, methane has taken center stage in climate discourse—not just scientifically, but politically. Once a topic reserved for technical discussions about manure management and feed efficiency, it has become a flashpoint in debates over sustainability, regulation, and even the legitimacy of livestock farming itself.

Dr. Frank Mitloehner, Professor and Air Quality Specialist with the CLEAR Center sits down with Associate Director for Communications at the CLEAR Center, Joe Proudman.