Farms.com Home   News

Intensified Meat Production in Response to Climate Change would bring Short-term Rewards, Long-term Risks

Intensified Meat Production in Response to Climate Change would bring Short-term Rewards, Long-term Risks

As climate change threatens global food supplies, countries will need to increase the efficiency of food production, bringing about short-term gains, such as decreased deforestation, but long-term risks, including future pandemics stemming from animal-borne diseases, finds a new analysis appearing in the journal Science Advances.

Much of this current and anticipated "intensification" of agriculture centers on increasing  through more efficient means, including factory farming, which keeps animals in closely confined environments and raises the risk of the spread of zoonotic diseases, such as .

"As long as meat consumption continues to rise globally, both , from deforestation and methane, and pandemics will likely continue to rise," says Matthew Hayek, an assistant professor in New York University's Department of Environmental Studies and the author of the analysis, which reviews more than 100 articles studying the effects of intensifying  on the environment and on  that come from animals.

As the climate warms, researchers have concluded that countries will need to produce more food, and more efficiently, than ever before. To address these current and future needs, the agriculture industry has adopted "intensification" practices: adding more "inputs," such as machinery, hormones, and antibiotics, while increasing production.

Hayek's Science Advances analysis shows that intensification can, in the short term, reduce animal feed requirements and land use because animals are sedentary and gaining weight as fast as possible when placed in intensive facilities—rather than grazing on open land. This can decrease deforestation, helping to maintain wild animal habitats and buffering against diseases that come from those wild animals by keeping them far from regular human contact.

However, intensification can accelerate diseases that come from domestically farmed animals.

"This is because intensive production facilities confine animals close to each other," explains Hayek. "This confinement, most typically used for pigs and chickens, allows diseases to quickly spread and mutate rapidly between many thousands of animals in one facility."

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

Genomic Technologies and Public Trust - Dr. Ellen Goddard

Video: Genomic Technologies and Public Trust - Dr. Ellen Goddard


In this episode of The Swine it Podcast Show Canada, Dr. Ellen Goddard, Professor Emerita at the University of Alberta, discusses public acceptance of genomic technologies in pork production. She explains why disease resistance is viewed positively, how labeling affects trust, why farmers remain highly credible messengers, and how communication can shape consumer confidence around gene editing. Listen now on all major platforms!

"Not providing information is a choice that can affect long-term public trust."

Meet the guest: Dr. Ellen Goddard / ellen-goddard-11541138 is Professor Emerita at the University of Alberta and an agricultural economist. Her work focuses on consumer behavior, trust, livestock sectors, and public attitudes toward food technologies. She also specializes in economic modeling for pork, beef, and dairy systems. Learn more from Dr. Ellen Goddard on the Swine in Canada Podcast Show, available on all major platforms.