Farms.com Home   News

Milk quality and robotic milking systems

It should come as no surprise that cows are cows, and no matter how they’re milked, the same rules governing cleanliness and hygiene apply.

That lesson was brought home last month at the National Mastitis Council, where Don Anderson, with Quality Milk Management, New Brunswick, Canada, compared milk quality in robot- versus conventionally-milked herds.

The first robotic milking system in North America was installed in Canada in 1999. Since then, about 1,300 Canadian dairy farms have installed Automated Milking System (AMS) technology, or about one in eight Canadian dairy farms.

After nearly 20 years of experience, Anderson says what is true of conventional milking systems is doubly true of AMS milking:

  • Cows must be clean; the margin for error is small.
  • Milking equipment maintenance and analysis are critical.
  • Farmers with AMS must utilize all existing milk quality tools.

At first blush, it appears AMS milk quality is as good as conventionally milked herds. Somatic cell counts (SCCs) are appreciably no different. Conventionally milked Canadian herds are averaging 228,000 cells/mL while Canadian AMS herds average 231,000 cells/mL. The story is much the same when the data is broken down by province, see table.

But there have been some milk quality concerns raised at the provincial level. “[In Ontario], there has been a significant number of high bacteria counts on AMS farms, as well as elevated freezing point and a slightly higher number of (antibiotic) inhibitor infractions,” says Anderson.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

Season 6, Episode 10: Defining Resiliency and the Research Driving Swine Health Forward

Video: Season 6, Episode 10: Defining Resiliency and the Research Driving Swine Health Forward

Genetic research and new technologies continue to influence the future of swine health and production efficiency. In this episode, we explore how research and technology are being used to support stronger, more resilient pigs, while also improving overall production outcomes. In this episode, we are joined by Dr. Jenelle Dunkelberger, geneticist with Topigs Norsvin, to discuss both routine and emerging strategies for improving piglet, pig, and sow livability. She outlines two primary approaches to enhancing resiliency: gene editing and traditional selective breeding. Continuing the resiliency conversation, we also hear from Dr. Lucina Galina, director of technical research projects at the Pig Improvement Company. She shares insights into ongoing gene-editing work focused on PRRS, detailing the pathway to success, regulatory and practical considerations, and the questions that still remain as the technology evolves. Together, these conversations provide a closer look at how research, genetics and innovation are shaping the future of swine health and livability.