Food Inspection Agency slammed for handling of bovine tuberculosis case

Oct 28, 2025

The owners of the farm at the centre of Canada’s most recent bovine tuberculosis outbreak said the Canadian Food Inspection Agency can’t manage its own protocols and requires a new process for such situations.

Erin Sawley, who operates East Point Cattle Co. near Melville, with her husband, Shane, said they followed proper procedures after a positive case was discovered, but she understands why others might not want to.

She told the House of Commons agriculture committee earlier this month that Canada’s disease control system relies on producers to do the right thing to ensure food safety and maintain market confidence, but producers are left on their own “facing rigid procedures, limited opportunities for discretion from CFIA staff and an entirely insufficient level of communication.”

“In our experience, the CFIA is not equipped to manage its own protocols effectively and its policies lack the flexibility needed to respond to real world challenges,” she said.

Their herd of more than 2,000 head was destroyed after the February 2025 order, yet they still don’t know what compensation they will receive. The strain of bovine TB had never before been detected and its source remains unknown.

In June, federal agriculture minister Heath MacDonald announced the maximum value per animal would go up, from $10,000 per registered head to $16,500 and from $4,500 to $10,000 for commercial animals. However, Sawley said market prices continue to rise and those values may soon be out of date.

She suggested CFIA use a model with more flexibility rather than set prices.

“We’re 304 days in and we have no idea what our compensation is going to look like,” Sawley said in response to a question.

Click here to see more...

Video: Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG emissions) in the Canadian swine sector found that CH4 emissions from manure were the largest contributor to the overall emissions, followed by emissions from energy use and crop production.

This innovative project, "Improving Swine Manure-Digestate Management Practices Towards Carbon Neutrality With Net Zero Emission Concepts," from Dr. Rajinikanth Rajagopal, under Swine Cluster 4, seeks to develop strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

While the management of manure can be very demanding and expensive for swine operations, it can also be viewed as an opportunity for GHG mitigation, as manure storage is an emission source built and managed by swine producers. Moreover, the majority of CH4 emissions from manure occur during a short period of time in the summer, which can potentially be mitigated with targeted intervention.

In tandem with understanding baseline emissions, Dr. Rajagopal's work focuses on evaluating emission mitigation options. Manure additives have the potential of reducing manure methane emissions. Additives can be deployed relatively quickly, enabling near-term emission reductions while biodigesters are being built. Furthermore, additives can be a long-term solution at farms where biogas is not feasible (e.g., when it’s too far from a central digester). Similarly, after biodigestion, additives can also be used to further reduce emissions from storage to minimize the carbon intensity of the bioenergy.