Farms.com Home   News

TMR Management – Ensuring Formulated Rations Make it to the Bunk

TMR Management – Ensuring Formulated Rations Make it to the Bunk

By Rainey Rosemond

As feed costs continue to rise and impact the bottom line, feed efficiency is becoming increasingly important to producers. While the formulated ration is critical to keeping feed costs within reason, on-farm feed management should be a focus to ensure that formulated rations are effectively delivered to all cows.

Critically important in total mixed ration (TMR) feeding systems is the consistency of the ration delivered to cows. Rations varying in weights of each ingredient, total weight delivered, particle size distribution, mixing order, or mixing time could impact individual cow performance.

Total weight delivered and the weight of each ingredient included in rations is impacted by the feedstuffs' dry matter (DM). If feed DM changes from the previous week or with weather events, this could impact the actual amount of feed being added to the mixer. Shifts in the amount of each ingredient added can alter the nutrients making it to the bunk. It is a best practice to check feed DM weekly to ensure adequate and consistent amounts of each ingredient are incorporated into rations.

Figure 1. Depicts varying particle size in feed.

tmr

Particle size distribution within rations is also important to cow health and performance. A TMR lacking adequate particle size could negatively affect health and result in production issues associated with inadequate fiber. Herds with low physically effective fiber could experience milk fat depression. Additionally, low physically effective fiber can lead to metabolic problems if saliva production drops as additional chewing is no longer stimulated. On the other hand, having long chopped forages or forages that do not mix well could lead to sorting. This would appear as though ration nutrients are being adequately delivered to the bunk, but issues with cow health and performance could result from rations too low in physically effective fiber.

Mixing time also plays a part in particle size distribution. If rations are mixed for too long, forages could become too fine. Similarly, if rations are not mixed long enough, hay or long-chopped forages could come out in clumps and be easily sorted. Mixing time will vary from farm to farm based on the mixer's recommendation. Manufacturer’s instructions should be followed and after all ingredients are added to the mixing wagon, allow for standing mixing time on a flat, even surface before delivering feed to the bunk. To avoid varying post mixing time from day to day keep a timer present at the time of mixing.

Daily monitoring of refusal amounts can offer insights into forage or feed moisture changes as well as group dynamics. High-producing dairy cows should have from 1-3% refusals, while low producing or dry cows can be fed to 0.5-3% refusal levels. Properly adjusting the percent refusals up or down requires daily monitoring. To ensure milk production is not negatively impacted, adjust management strategies when the targeted refusal amount is not met. Refusals amounts lower than the desired percentage may indicate the cow requires more energy, and the delivery amounts should be increased. Similarly, when refusals are high, energy intake may decrease, and initial delivery amounts can be reduced. Further investigation is warranted when drastic swings in the amount of feed remaining at the bunk are detected. Collecting daily refusal weights and using this information to calculate estimated feed intake per cow allows producers to more effectively monitor feed efficiency.

Source : psu.edu

Trending Video

Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Video: Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG emissions) in the Canadian swine sector found that CH4 emissions from manure were the largest contributor to the overall emissions, followed by emissions from energy use and crop production.

This innovative project, "Improving Swine Manure-Digestate Management Practices Towards Carbon Neutrality With Net Zero Emission Concepts," from Dr. Rajinikanth Rajagopal, under Swine Cluster 4, seeks to develop strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

While the management of manure can be very demanding and expensive for swine operations, it can also be viewed as an opportunity for GHG mitigation, as manure storage is an emission source built and managed by swine producers. Moreover, the majority of CH4 emissions from manure occur during a short period of time in the summer, which can potentially be mitigated with targeted intervention.

In tandem with understanding baseline emissions, Dr. Rajagopal's work focuses on evaluating emission mitigation options. Manure additives have the potential of reducing manure methane emissions. Additives can be deployed relatively quickly, enabling near-term emission reductions while biodigesters are being built. Furthermore, additives can be a long-term solution at farms where biogas is not feasible (e.g., when it’s too far from a central digester). Similarly, after biodigestion, additives can also be used to further reduce emissions from storage to minimize the carbon intensity of the bioenergy.