Weed Control in Sweet Corn

Apr 29, 2021

By Gared Shaffer

Sweet corn is popular among producers and gardeners and grown across South Dakota. When growing sweet corn on a large scale, weed control can be challenging. Physical, hand weeding may be unrealistic, and research has found tillage leads to unhealthy soil systems that may increase weed pressure in the future. Several herbicides are labeled for sweet corn production, which can be the easiest and most cost-friendly method. Certain steps need to be taken before choosing an herbicide to control weeds in sweet corn. Identifying weeds that are present in the field, knowledge about soil type and hybrid-herbicide interaction can play a vital role in properly controlling weeds in a sweet corn field. Also, crop rotation or a subsequent crop that will be grown in the field will have an impact on what herbicide is selected for the weed control.

Sweet corn hybrids vary in their tolerance of herbicides. Super sweet hybrids are commonly more susceptible to damage from sulfonylurea herbicides, like Pursuit and Accent Q. If residual herbicide is a concern, then contact herbicides are the best option for both pre and post-emergent. For post-emergent, make sure the sweet corn hybrid has the technology to resist the application of an herbicide like glyphosate (Roundup Ready 2 Technology sweet corn hybrids). If non-GMO sweet corn hybrids are planted, then post-applied herbicide options are limited. There are more pre-emergent herbicides available in sweet corn than post-emergent. Thus, it is more feasible to use a quality pre-emergent product.

A few of the pre-emergent/burndown sweet corn options are Atrazine, Acuron, Acuron Flexi, Harness, Harness Xtra, Armezon, Armezon PRO, Anthem Maxx, Bicep Lite II Magnum and Zidua. If weed issues are present after emergence, there still are a few options. Depending upon hybrid, Accent Q and Laudis can provide good post-emergent control of grasses and broadleaves. For post-emergent, broadleaf-only control, there are many options in sweet corn and some of those are Anthem products, Callisto, Laudis and Starane.

Source : sdstate.edu

Video: Turning Plant Defense Into a Management Strategy

Turning Plant Defense Into a Management Strategy

Understanding how a plant responds to stress is one thing.

Using that knowledge to make better management decisions is another.

Systemic acquired resistance, or SAR, is the plant's more direct defense response. When stress or infection occurs, the plant begins signaling throughout its system and preparing defensive compounds.

But if we know that response exists, can we help prepare the plant before the stress arrives?

The answer starts with understanding what triggers the response and what the plant needs to carry it out.

The Trigger and the Fuel

Salicylic acid plays an important role in triggering the SAR pathway.

Think of it as turning the truck on.

The engine may be running, but it still needs fuel to do the work.

In this case, manganese plays an important role in supporting the enzyme systems involved in the plant's defensive response.

This makes manganese status an important part of the conversation. Whether a producer is using tissue testing, sap analysis, or simply scouting for visible deficiency symptoms, the goal is to make sure the plant has adequate manganese available.

Manganese is required in relatively small amounts, but that does not make its role small.

If the plant receives a signal to defend itself but lacks the nutrition needed to support that response, it may struggle to carry out the process efficiently.

The trigger matters.

The fuel matters too.

Prepare Before the Stress Arrives

The best time to think about stress management is before the plant is overwhelmed.

Once a crop is already struggling, management can quickly turn into a game of catch-up.

This is similar to nitrogen management. Once a plant becomes severely deficient, correcting the problem does not necessarily erase the time and yield potential already lost.

Plant defense can work the same way.

Low-rate, targeted approaches designed to support the SAR pathway may fit best ahead of an expected stress event rather than after significant damage has already occurred.

That requires producers to think about predictable stress.

We may not know exactly what the weather will do tomorrow, but we generally know summer heat is coming. We know certain field conditions increase disease pressure. We know a herbicide application can temporarily stress a crop as the plant processes the chemistry.

Even a properly timed and labeled herbicide application can create a temporary response in the plant.

That does not mean the herbicide is bad.

Weeds can create significantly more yield loss than the temporary stress caused by controlling them.

The question is not whether we should eliminate every stressor.

The question is whether we can better prepare the plant to manage necessary and predictable stress.

Not All Stress Is Bad

Stress is a normal part of plant growth.

A perfectly stress-free environment does not exist in the field.

In fact, some stress is necessary for normal plant development. A plant responds to wind, temperature, moisture, sunlight, and countless other environmental signals throughout the season.

The environment is stress.

The plant's job is to manage it.

Problems begin when the stress load becomes greater than the plant's ability to respond.

Extreme heat, drought, high salt concentrations, disease pressure, and even certain management practices can add to that load.

This is where understanding SAR becomes useful.

Instead of waiting until the plant is visibly struggling, producers can begin identifying periods when stress is likely and make management decisions around those windows.

ISR Starts With the Soil

While SAR is a more direct defense response, induced systemic resistance, or ISR, brings the conversation back to soil health.

The longevity of a farm is closely connected to the health of its soil.

Carbon plays a major role because it supports biological life within the soil. Bacteria, fungi, and other organisms interact with plant roots and influence how the plant grows, accesses nutrients, and prepares for stress.

This is why soil health cannot be reduced to one product or one application.

It is a system.

Keeping living plants in the field longer can support biological activity. Cover crops may fit some operations. Better water management can improve soil conditions.