Farms.com Home   Ag Industry News

Bridging the gap in ag conversations

Bridging the gap in ag conversations

By sharing their values, producers can engage with consumers about farming practices

 
Staff Writer
Farms.com
 
Producers can help maintain a good dialogue with the public by engaging with consumers about shared values. 
 
“Consumers have a lot of questions about how their food is grown and raised,” Dr. Leah Dorman, the director of food integrity and consumer engagement with Phibro Animal Health, said in a Farmscape article on Tuesday. Farmers could answer these questions by sharing their on-farm practices with consumers, she explained.
 
“Our values are very closely aligned with consumer values, and much more so than most consumers believe,” she said. “It's important that we make a connection with consumers in an open, honest type of dialogue, (and that) we make that connection on a values level first.”
 
Farmers can explain agricultural practices, and talk to consumers about animal care and animal health, Dorman said. 
 
“It could be, how does what we do on the farm affect them and (the) healthy, affordable, food that they feed their family? It's important that we really (understand) what they are concerned about and connect with them at that level, understanding what they're asking of us, and then giving them additional information (once) we've made that connection,” she said.
 
Then, “farmers can follow up with the science that supports what they do.” 
 
She discussed “Reframing the Conversation” during the 2019 Manitoba Swine Seminar.
 
Farms.com has reached out to Dairy Farmers of Canada for comment. 
 
pixdeluxe/Royalty-free/Getty Images photo
 

Trending Video

Wheat Yields in USA and China Threatened by Heat Waves Breaking Enzymes

Video: Wheat Yields in USA and China Threatened by Heat Waves Breaking Enzymes

A new peer reviewed study looks at the generally unrecognized risk of heat waves surpassing the threshold for enzyme damage in wheat.

Most studies that look at crop failure in the main food growing regions (breadbaskets of the planet) look at temperatures and droughts in the historical records to assess present day risk. Since the climate system has changed, these historical based risk analysis studies underestimate the present-day risks.

What this new research study does is generate an ensemble of plausible scenarios for the present climate in terms of temperatures and precipitation, and looks at how many of these plausible scenarios exceed the enzyme-breaking temperature of 32.8 C for wheat, and exceed the high stress yield reducing temperature of 27.8 C for wheat. Also, the study considers the possibility of a compounded failure with heat waves in both regions simultaneously, this greatly reducing global wheat supply and causing severe shortages.

Results show that the likelihood (risk) of wheat crop failure with a one-in-hundred likelihood in 1981 has in today’s climate become increased by 16x in the USA winter wheat crop (to one-in-six) and by 6x in northeast China (to one-in-sixteen).

The risks determined in this new paper are much greater than that obtained in previous work that determines risk by analyzing historical climate patterns.

Clearly, since the climate system is rapidly changing, we cannot assume stationarity and calculate risk probabilities like we did traditionally before.

We are essentially on a new planet, with a new climate regime, and have to understand that everything is different now.