Farms.com Home   Ag Industry News

Prop 12 implementation delayed

Prop 12 implementation delayed

It won’t come into effect until the end of 2023

By Diego Flammini
Staff Writer
Farms.com

Proposition 12 won’t come into effect in California until the end of the year.

A Superior Court in Sacramento County granted a six-month delay, meaning the rule, which prohibits the sale of pork, eggs and other products that aren’t produced according to California’s standards, won’t take effect until Dec. 31, 2023.

The original implementation date was July 1.

This six-month grace period will help allow for a smoother transition and keep food on store shelves.

The California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) “understands that there will necessarily be a period of transition,” part of the court order states. “CDFA reiterates that for the remainder of 2023, we intend to focus our limited implementation resources, not on covered products already in commerce…”

Industry groups are pleased with the extension.

Six additional months ensures customers will have product to choose from, but it doesn’t solve the overall issue, said Bryan Humphreys, CEO of the National Pork Producers Council.

“Granting six months of additional relief for products in the supply chain allows grocery stores to remain stocked so the 40 million Californians have uninterrupted access to affordable, safe and nutritious pork products, especially with rising food prices,” he said in a June 21 statement. “While this temporary solution does not solve the challenges and uncertainty California Proposition 12 brings to our industry, NPPC looks forward to working with Congress to find a permanent solution to this problem.”

California represents about 15 percent of the U.S. market for bacon and other pork products.

Producers who want to sell products to California will likely incur additional production costs.

In the case of pork, Prop 12 requires 24-square-feet of usable floor space per animal to all gilts at breeding, weaned sows and gestating gilts and sows.

Rabobank estimates farmers could pay up to $2,500 per sow to bring their barns up to California’s standards.

Increased costs could also lead to higher food prices.

“Rabobank expects a shortfall in compliant pork to bifurcate the US market, leaving California with a severe pork deficit (and high prices) while generating a surplus in the rest of the US market,” a 2021 report says.

Members of Congress are actively trying to stop California from having the authority to force Prop 12 on American farmers.

Senators recently introduced the Ending Agricultural Trade Suppression (EATS) Act.

Under this bill, a State government “shall not impose a standard or condition on the preharvest production of any agricultural products sold or offered for sale in inter-state commerce…”


Trending Video

Advancing Swine Disease Traceability: USDA's No-Cost RFID Tag Program for Market Channels

Video: Advancing Swine Disease Traceability: USDA's No-Cost RFID Tag Program for Market Channels

On-demand webinar, hosted by the Meat Institute, experts from the USDA, National Pork Board (NPB) and Merck Animal Health introduced the no-cost 840 RFID tag program—a five-year initiative supported through African swine fever (ASF) preparedness efforts. Beginning in Fall 2025, eligible sow producers, exhibition swine owners and State Animal Health Officials can order USDA-funded RFID tags through Merck A2025-10_nimal Health.

NPB staff also highlighted an additional initiative, funded by USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Veterinary Services through NPB, that helps reduce the cost of transitioning to RFID tags across the swine industry and strengthens national traceability efforts.

Topics Covered:

•USDA’s RFID tag initiative background and current traceability practices

•How to access and order no-cost 840 RFID tags

•Equipment support for tag readers and panels

•Implementation timelines for market and cull sow channels How RFID improves ASF preparedness an