Farms.com Home   News

Agriculture Accelerated Human Genome Evolution to Capture Energy From Starchy Foods, Study Suggests

By Robert Sanders

Over the past 12,000 years, humans in Europe have dramatically increased their ability to digest carbohydrates, expanding the number of genes they have for enzymes that break down starch from an average of eight to more than 11, according to a new study by researchers from the U.S., Italy and United Kingdom

The rise in the number of genes that code for these enzymes tracks the spread of agriculture across Europe from the Middle East, and with it, an increasingly starchy human diet rich in high-carbohydrate staples such as wheat and other grains. Having more copies of a gene usually translates to higher levels of the protein the genes code for—in this case, the enzyme amylase, which is produced in saliva and the pancreas to break down starch into sugar to fuel the body.

The study, published today (Sept. 4) in the journal Nature, also provides a new method for identifying the causes of diseases that involve genes with multiple copies in the human genome, such as the genes for amylase.

The research was led by Peter Sudmant, assistant professor of integrative biology at the University of California, Berkeley, and Erik Garrison of the University of Tennessee Health Science Center in Memphis.

"If you take a piece of dry pasta and put it in your mouth, eventually it'll get a little bit sweet," Sudmant said. "That's your  enzyme breaking the starches down into sugars. That happens in all humans, as well as in other primates."

Chimpanzee, bonobo and Neanderthal genomes all have a single copy of the gene on chromosome 1 that codes for the salivary amylase, referred to as AMY1. The same is true for the two pancreatic amylase genes, AMY2A and AMY2B. These three genes are located close to one another in a region of the primate genome known as the amylase locus.

Human genomes, however, harbor vastly different numbers of each amylase gene.

"Our study found that each copy of the human genome harbors one to 11 copies of AMY1, zero to three copies of AMY2A, and one to four copies of AMY2B," said UC Berkeley postdoctoral fellow Runyang Nicolas Lou, one of five first authors of the paper. "Copy number is correlated with gene expression and protein level and thus the ability to digest starch."

The researchers discovered that, while around 12,000 years ago humans across Europe had an average of about four copies of the salivary amylase gene, that number has increased to about seven. The combined number of copies of the two pancreatic amylase genes also increased by half a gene (0.5) on average over this time in Europe.

Survival advantage of multiple amylase genes

Overall, the incidence of chromosomes with multiple copies of amylase genes (that is, more total copies than chimpanzees and Neanderthals) increased sevenfold over the last 12,000 years, suggesting that this provided a survival advantage for our ancestors.

The researchers also found evidence for an increase in amylase genes in other agricultural populations around the world, and that the region of the chromosomes where these amylase genes are located looks similar in all these populations, no matter what specific starchy plant that culture domesticated.

The findings demonstrate that as agriculture arose independently around the world, it seems to have rapidly altered the human genome in nearly identical ways in different populations to deal with increased carbohydrates in the diet.

In fact, the researchers found that the rate of evolution leading to changes in amylase gene copy number was 10,000 times faster than that of single DNA base pair changes in the human genome.

"It has long been hypothesized that the copy number of amylase genes had increased in Europeans since the dawn of agriculture, but we had never been able to sequence this locus fully before. It is extremely repetitive and complex," Sudmant said.

"Now, we're finally able to fully capture these structurally complex regions, and with that, investigate the history of selection of the region, the timing of evolution and the diversity across worldwide populations. Now, we can start thinking about associations with human disease."

One suspected association is with tooth decay. Previous studies have suggested that having more copies of AMY1 is associated with more cavities, perhaps because the saliva does a better job of converting starch in chewed food into sugar, which feeds bacteria that eat away at teeth.

The research also provides a method for exploring other areas of the genome—those involving the immune system, skin pigmentation and the production of mucus, for example—that have undergone rapid gene duplication in recent human history, Garrison said.

"One of the exciting things we were able to do here is probe both modern and ancient genomes to dissect the history of structural evolution at this locus," he said.

These methods can also be applied to other species. Previous studies have shown that animals that hang out around humans—dogs, pigs, rats and mice—have more copies of the amylase gene than their wilder relatives, apparently to take advantage of the food we throw away.

"This is really the frontier, in my opinion," Garrison said. "We can, for the first time, look at all of these regions that we could never look at before, and not just in humans—other species, too. Human disease studies have really struggled in identifying associations at complex loci, like amylase. Because the  is so high, traditional association methods can fail. We're really excited about how far we can push our new methods to identify new genetic causes of disease."

From hunter-gatherer to agrarian

Scientists have long suspected that humans' ability to digest starch may have increased after our ancestors transitioned from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to a settled, agricultural lifestyle. This shift was shown to be associated with more copies of the amylase genes in people from societies that domesticated plants.

But the area of the human genome where these copies reside has been difficult to study because traditional sequencing—so-called short-read sequencing techniques that cut the genome into chunks of about 100 base pairs, sequence the millions of pieces and then reassemble them into a genome—was unable to distinguish gene copies from one another. Complicating matters, some copies are inverted, that is, they are flipped and read from the opposite strand of DNA.

Long-read sequencing allows scientists to resolve this region, reading DNA sequences thousands of base pairs long to accurately capture repetitive stretches. At the time of the study, the Human Pangenome Reference Consortium (HPRC) had collected long-read sequences of 94 human haploid genomes, which Sudmant and colleagues used to assess the variety of contemporary amylase regions, called haplotypes.

The team then assessed the same region in 519 ancient European genomes. The HPRC data helped avoid a common bias in comparative genomic studies, which have used a single, averaged human genome as a reference. The genomes from the HPRC, referred to as a pangenome, provide a more inclusive reference that more accurately captures human diversity.

Joana Rocha, a UC Berkeley postdoctoral fellow and co-first author of the paper, compared the region where amylase  cluster to what she called "sculptures made of different Lego bricks. Those are the haplotype structures. Previous work had to take down the sculpture first and infer from a pile of bricks what the sculpture may have looked like.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

Turning Plant Defense Into a Management Strategy

Video: Turning Plant Defense Into a Management Strategy

Turning Plant Defense Into a Management Strategy

Understanding how a plant responds to stress is one thing.

Using that knowledge to make better management decisions is another.

Systemic acquired resistance, or SAR, is the plant's more direct defense response. When stress or infection occurs, the plant begins signaling throughout its system and preparing defensive compounds.

But if we know that response exists, can we help prepare the plant before the stress arrives?

The answer starts with understanding what triggers the response and what the plant needs to carry it out.

The Trigger and the Fuel

Salicylic acid plays an important role in triggering the SAR pathway.

Think of it as turning the truck on.

The engine may be running, but it still needs fuel to do the work.

In this case, manganese plays an important role in supporting the enzyme systems involved in the plant's defensive response.

This makes manganese status an important part of the conversation. Whether a producer is using tissue testing, sap analysis, or simply scouting for visible deficiency symptoms, the goal is to make sure the plant has adequate manganese available.

Manganese is required in relatively small amounts, but that does not make its role small.

If the plant receives a signal to defend itself but lacks the nutrition needed to support that response, it may struggle to carry out the process efficiently.

The trigger matters.

The fuel matters too.

Prepare Before the Stress Arrives

The best time to think about stress management is before the plant is overwhelmed.

Once a crop is already struggling, management can quickly turn into a game of catch-up.

This is similar to nitrogen management. Once a plant becomes severely deficient, correcting the problem does not necessarily erase the time and yield potential already lost.

Plant defense can work the same way.

Low-rate, targeted approaches designed to support the SAR pathway may fit best ahead of an expected stress event rather than after significant damage has already occurred.

That requires producers to think about predictable stress.

We may not know exactly what the weather will do tomorrow, but we generally know summer heat is coming. We know certain field conditions increase disease pressure. We know a herbicide application can temporarily stress a crop as the plant processes the chemistry.

Even a properly timed and labeled herbicide application can create a temporary response in the plant.

That does not mean the herbicide is bad.

Weeds can create significantly more yield loss than the temporary stress caused by controlling them.

The question is not whether we should eliminate every stressor.

The question is whether we can better prepare the plant to manage necessary and predictable stress.

Not All Stress Is Bad

Stress is a normal part of plant growth.

A perfectly stress-free environment does not exist in the field.

In fact, some stress is necessary for normal plant development. A plant responds to wind, temperature, moisture, sunlight, and countless other environmental signals throughout the season.

The environment is stress.

The plant's job is to manage it.

Problems begin when the stress load becomes greater than the plant's ability to respond.

Extreme heat, drought, high salt concentrations, disease pressure, and even certain management practices can add to that load.

This is where understanding SAR becomes useful.

Instead of waiting until the plant is visibly struggling, producers can begin identifying periods when stress is likely and make management decisions around those windows.

ISR Starts With the Soil

While SAR is a more direct defense response, induced systemic resistance, or ISR, brings the conversation back to soil health.

The longevity of a farm is closely connected to the health of its soil.

Carbon plays a major role because it supports biological life within the soil. Bacteria, fungi, and other organisms interact with plant roots and influence how the plant grows, accesses nutrients, and prepares for stress.

This is why soil health cannot be reduced to one product or one application.

It is a system.

Keeping living plants in the field longer can support biological activity. Cover crops may fit some operations. Better water management can improve soil conditions.