Farms.com Home   News

Deciding on Fungicide Application to Manage Mid-Late Season Soybean Leaf Fungal Diseases

By Emmanuel Byamukama

Soybean leaf diseases such as frogeye leaf spot, brown/Septoria spot, and Cercospora leaf blight, can develop, in some soybean fields, to reach yield-reducing levels. Severe frogeye leaf spot (Figure 1) or brown spot (Figure 2) can lead to premature leaf drop.

The best timing for foliar fungicide application to manage these diseases is the R3-R4 (beginning pod to full pod) growth stages. The question that growers often ask is whether it is profitable to apply a fungicide to soybeans at the R3/R4 growth stage in South Dakota.

The short answer is the return on the fungicide investment for controlling foliar diseases depends on the fungal disease pressure observed on the plants at the R3/R4 growth stage.

Figure 1. A soybean field with heavy frogeye leaf spot infection. Premature defoliation will occur in plants with high levels of this disease.

Fungicide Efficacy

Several fungicide efficacy reports indicate that there is a limited benefit to applying fungicides in soybean in South Dakota primarily due to low disease pressure.

Figure 2. A soybean plant with heavy brown spot severity on mid-lower canopy.

Our small plot research trials looked at several products and did not detect significant statistical differences. The highest disease pressure (assessed 21 days after product application) was less than 2% (Table 1). Similarly, on-farm fungicide strip trials (field-length side by side trials) also showed mostly non-significant differences between fungicide treated strips and non-treated strips (no fungicide applied). Out of 11 on-farm strip trials in 2019, only 2 had a positive return to fungicide application.

Visit the South Dakota Soybean On-Farm Research Program’s trials website for the on-farm trial results on fungicides and other practices conducted by Professor David Clay’s group.

TABLE 1. EFFECT OF FUNGICIDE APPLICATION ON SOYBEAN DISEASE SEVERITY AND GRAIN YIELD. FUNGICIDE APPLICATION DID NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON YIELD COMPARED TO NON-TREATED PLOTS.

Treatment/Rate/Timing
Brown spot (%)
Frogeye leaf spot (%)
Yield (bu/ac)
Non-treated check
0.30 a
0.83 a
52.06 a
Priaxor, 8fl oz/A@R3
0.45 a
1.80 a
58.73 a
Fortix, 4fl oz/A@R3
0.33 a
1.43 a
56.44 a
Sonata, 1qt/A@R3
0.08 a
1.73 a
53.85 a
Domark 230ME, 4fl oz/A@R3
0.28 a
1.68 a
50.94 a
Trivapro 10fl oz/A@R3
0.13 a
1.28 a
57.57 a
Zolera FX 3.34SC, 5fl oz/A@R3
0.43 a
1.28 a
50.74 a
Delaro, 8fl oz/A@R3
0.15 a
1.13 a
59.96 a

Application Considerations

Both the small plots research and on farm trials indicate that a decision to apply a fungicide to control mid- to late-season soybean diseases should be based on the likelihood for foliar diseases to develop. This can be determined by considering field disease history, susceptibility of the cultivar planted, type and level of diseases already developing, and weather conditions.

Of the leaf diseases which can develop late in season in soybeans, frogeye leaf spot is the most important and can result in significant yield losses. Moreover, the frogeye leaf spot pathogen has been found to be resistant to strobilurin fungicides (QoI, FRAC Code 11) in several fields in South Dakota. What this means for fields with frogeye pathogen isolates resistant to QoIs, applying these fungicides will be like applying water, the fungus will not be affected. To avoid further development of more frogeye leaf spot pathogen isolates with QoI resistance, these fungicides should not be applied in fields with moderate levels of frogeye leaf spot. Other modes, like triazoles or SDHI fungicides, should be used instead.

If a fungicide is determined to be needed, there are a number of fungicides available on the market which are effective against the common foliar diseases in soybeans. An efficacy table developed by Plant Pathologists in the Northcentral Region provides information on which products to use for various soybean diseases.

Source : sdstate.edu

Trending Video

From Conventional to Regenerative: Will Groeneveld’s Journey Back to the Land

Video: From Conventional to Regenerative: Will Groeneveld’s Journey Back to the Land

"You realize you've got a pretty finite number of years to do this. If you ever want to try something new, you better do it."

That mindset helped Will Groeneveld take a bold turn on his Alberta grain farm. A lifelong farmer, Will had never heard of regenerative agriculture until 2018, when he attended a seminar by Kevin Elmy that shifted his worldview. What began as curiosity quickly turned into a deep exploration of how biology—not just chemistry—shapes the health of our soils, crops and ecosystems.

In this video, Will candidly reflects on his family’s farming history, how the operation evolved from a traditional mixed farm to grain-only, and how the desire to improve the land pushed him to invite livestock back into the rotation—without owning a single cow.

Today, through creative partnerships and a commitment to the five principles of regenerative agriculture, Will is reintroducing diversity, building soil health and extending living roots in the ground for as much of the year as possible. Whether it’s through intercropping, zero tillage (which he’s practiced since the 1980s) or managing forage for visiting cattle, Will’s approach is a testament to continuous learning and a willingness to challenge old norms.

Will is a participant in the Regenerative Agriculture Lab (RAL), a social innovation process bringing together producers, researchers, retailers and others to co-create a resilient regenerative agriculture system in Alberta. His story highlights both the potential and humility required to farm with nature, not against it.