Farmer leaders invited to join the Saskatchewan Pulse Growers and SaskOilseeds Boards of Directors

Jun 04, 2026

Saskatchewan Pulse Growers (SPG) and SaskOilseeds (SKO) are inviting nominations for their Boards of Directors, with terms beginning in January 2027. Both organizations encourage registered producers to put their names forward and help shape the future of Saskatchewan’s pulse and oilseed sectors.

This year, nominations are open for three positions on the SPG Board of Directors and four positions on the SKO Board of Directors. SPG directors serve three-year terms and may be re-elected twice, while SKO directors serve four-year terms and may be re-elected once.

Director Responsibilities

Directors on both Boards play an important role in providing strategic oversight and governance. Their work includes attending board meetings, serving on committees, taking on appointments to external industry-related boards, and representing the organization at industry events.

Serving on either Board is a meaningful opportunity to help shape the future of Saskatchewan agriculture and represent pulse and oilseed growers across the province, country, and globe.

How to Apply and Submit a Nomination

Saskatchewan Pulse Growers Board nominations: https://saskpulse.com/board-nominations/

SaskOilseeds Board nominations: https://saskoilseeds.com/about-us/nominations-election/

Application Deadline: 12:00 p.m. CST on September 11, 2026

Registered Producer Eligibility

The SPG Board includes nine farmer-elected Directors. Eligible nominees must be registered producers who have sold a pulse crop and paid levy to SPG since September 1, 2023.

The SKO Board includes eight farmer-elected Directors. Eligible nominees must be registered producers who sold canola and/or flax in one of the previous two crop years (August 1, 2024 to July 31, 2026) and have not requested a levy refund in the past year.

Saskatchewan Pulse Growers (SPG) is a not-for-profit organization representing and supporting approximately 15,000 pulse crop growers in Saskatchewan. Saskatchewan Pulse Growers’ mandate is to provide leadership for a profitable Saskatchewan pulse industry through research, market development, and communications. Accountable to and funded by growers, Saskatchewan Pulse Growers’ strategic direction is guided by a seven-member, producer-elected Board of Directors.

Click here to see more...

Video: Turning Plant Defense Into a Management Strategy

Turning Plant Defense Into a Management Strategy

Understanding how a plant responds to stress is one thing.

Using that knowledge to make better management decisions is another.

Systemic acquired resistance, or SAR, is the plant's more direct defense response. When stress or infection occurs, the plant begins signaling throughout its system and preparing defensive compounds.

But if we know that response exists, can we help prepare the plant before the stress arrives?

The answer starts with understanding what triggers the response and what the plant needs to carry it out.

The Trigger and the Fuel

Salicylic acid plays an important role in triggering the SAR pathway.

Think of it as turning the truck on.

The engine may be running, but it still needs fuel to do the work.

In this case, manganese plays an important role in supporting the enzyme systems involved in the plant's defensive response.

This makes manganese status an important part of the conversation. Whether a producer is using tissue testing, sap analysis, or simply scouting for visible deficiency symptoms, the goal is to make sure the plant has adequate manganese available.

Manganese is required in relatively small amounts, but that does not make its role small.

If the plant receives a signal to defend itself but lacks the nutrition needed to support that response, it may struggle to carry out the process efficiently.

The trigger matters.

The fuel matters too.

Prepare Before the Stress Arrives

The best time to think about stress management is before the plant is overwhelmed.

Once a crop is already struggling, management can quickly turn into a game of catch-up.

This is similar to nitrogen management. Once a plant becomes severely deficient, correcting the problem does not necessarily erase the time and yield potential already lost.

Plant defense can work the same way.

Low-rate, targeted approaches designed to support the SAR pathway may fit best ahead of an expected stress event rather than after significant damage has already occurred.

That requires producers to think about predictable stress.

We may not know exactly what the weather will do tomorrow, but we generally know summer heat is coming. We know certain field conditions increase disease pressure. We know a herbicide application can temporarily stress a crop as the plant processes the chemistry.

Even a properly timed and labeled herbicide application can create a temporary response in the plant.

That does not mean the herbicide is bad.

Weeds can create significantly more yield loss than the temporary stress caused by controlling them.

The question is not whether we should eliminate every stressor.

The question is whether we can better prepare the plant to manage necessary and predictable stress.

Not All Stress Is Bad

Stress is a normal part of plant growth.

A perfectly stress-free environment does not exist in the field.

In fact, some stress is necessary for normal plant development. A plant responds to wind, temperature, moisture, sunlight, and countless other environmental signals throughout the season.

The environment is stress.

The plant's job is to manage it.

Problems begin when the stress load becomes greater than the plant's ability to respond.

Extreme heat, drought, high salt concentrations, disease pressure, and even certain management practices can add to that load.

This is where understanding SAR becomes useful.

Instead of waiting until the plant is visibly struggling, producers can begin identifying periods when stress is likely and make management decisions around those windows.

ISR Starts With the Soil

While SAR is a more direct defense response, induced systemic resistance, or ISR, brings the conversation back to soil health.

The longevity of a farm is closely connected to the health of its soil.

Carbon plays a major role because it supports biological life within the soil. Bacteria, fungi, and other organisms interact with plant roots and influence how the plant grows, accesses nutrients, and prepares for stress.

This is why soil health cannot be reduced to one product or one application.

It is a system.

Keeping living plants in the field longer can support biological activity. Cover crops may fit some operations. Better water management can improve soil conditions.