Farms.com Home   News

FVGC welcomes tariff pause on Canadian and Mexican exports to U.S.

The Fruit and Vegetable Growers of Canada (FVGC) welcomes recent reports that the incoming U.S. administration plans to delay the proposed imposition of across-the-board tariffs on Canadian and Mexican exports. This measured decision provides a valuable opportunity for the Government of Canada and the fruit and vegetable sector to engage with stakeholders and underscore the benefits of fair and free intercontinental trade.

“We are cautiously optimistic about this development,” said Marcus Janzen, president of FVGC. “The pause reflects a prudent approach to trade and underscores the critical need to support growers, ensuring a resilient food production system that safeguards food security and affordable groceries for families on both sides of the border.”

The proposed tariffs, if implemented, would have destabilizing effects on Canadian agriculture, threatening $4.4 billion in annual fruit and vegetable exports to the United States. Greenhouse growers, who export up to 80 per cent of their produce to the U.S., would be particularly hard hit, while restrictions on Mexican imports could flood the Canadian market with diverted produce, creating downward pressure on prices and devastating Canadian growers.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

$400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Video: $400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Officials are forced to defend cutting a historic $3.8 million research farm while the government simultaneously funded an $8.5 million cricket factory that went bankrupt. Is this evidence of an incoherent spending strategy? Watch the full committee clash to see the government's official rationale.

A heated discussion erupts over the logic behind the government's cuts to AAFC research farms in Lacombe, Indian Head, and Quebec City. MPs question why core, decades-old scientific infrastructure is being deemed 'not core' while other, controversial programs were funded. The Deputy Minister is repeatedly pressed for the actual net savings of the decision versus the expense of relocating research programs.