Farms.com Home  › News

Harvest Aids for Corn and Soybeans

By Mark Loux

Options to try to make weedy fields more harvestable include preharvest application of certain herbicides or waiting until after frost to harvest, or both.  Weedy fields should generally be harvested as late as possible to give maximum time for weeds to die and dry down and rot. Vines can be especially problematic, and burcucumber seems to be having a good year based on comments we have received.  Our experience is that a combination of herbicide, time, and frost can be the most effective way to mitigate problems with vines.  They need to become rotted and brittle enough to be prevent them from tangling up harvesting equipment. 

One of the problems with preharvest herbicide applications is how to apply in mature crop, and how to maximize coverage of weeds with low-volume aerial applications.  Low spray volume limits the effectiveness of contact herbicides labeled for this use – Gramoxone, Aim, Sharpen (soybeans only).  Gramoxone can be effective for dessication of some weeds when applied by ground equipment in the recommended volume of 20 gpa.  Sharpen and Aim are not likely be effective enough across a range of weed species unless mixed with another herbicide.  Systemic herbicides will generally be the better choice in low-volume applications.  Glyphosate and dicamba are labeled for use in corn and soybeans, and 2,4-D is labeled for use in corn only. 

Information on preharvest herbicides is listed at the end of the corn and soybean herbicide description sections in the Weed Control Guide for Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and here.  The crop must be physiologically mature at time of herbicide application.  Labels specify what the measure of this is – black layer formed, dented, % of pods with mature brown color, etc.  The minimum interval between application and harvest to avoid residue problems is also specified, and ranges from 3 to 15 days. 

Source : osu.edu

Trending Video

Turning Plant Defense Into a Management Strategy

Video: Turning Plant Defense Into a Management Strategy

Turning Plant Defense Into a Management Strategy

Understanding how a plant responds to stress is one thing.

Using that knowledge to make better management decisions is another.

Systemic acquired resistance, or SAR, is the plant's more direct defense response. When stress or infection occurs, the plant begins signaling throughout its system and preparing defensive compounds.

But if we know that response exists, can we help prepare the plant before the stress arrives?

The answer starts with understanding what triggers the response and what the plant needs to carry it out.

The Trigger and the Fuel

Salicylic acid plays an important role in triggering the SAR pathway.

Think of it as turning the truck on.

The engine may be running, but it still needs fuel to do the work.

In this case, manganese plays an important role in supporting the enzyme systems involved in the plant's defensive response.

This makes manganese status an important part of the conversation. Whether a producer is using tissue testing, sap analysis, or simply scouting for visible deficiency symptoms, the goal is to make sure the plant has adequate manganese available.

Manganese is required in relatively small amounts, but that does not make its role small.

If the plant receives a signal to defend itself but lacks the nutrition needed to support that response, it may struggle to carry out the process efficiently.

The trigger matters.

The fuel matters too.

Prepare Before the Stress Arrives

The best time to think about stress management is before the plant is overwhelmed.

Once a crop is already struggling, management can quickly turn into a game of catch-up.

This is similar to nitrogen management. Once a plant becomes severely deficient, correcting the problem does not necessarily erase the time and yield potential already lost.

Plant defense can work the same way.

Low-rate, targeted approaches designed to support the SAR pathway may fit best ahead of an expected stress event rather than after significant damage has already occurred.

That requires producers to think about predictable stress.

We may not know exactly what the weather will do tomorrow, but we generally know summer heat is coming. We know certain field conditions increase disease pressure. We know a herbicide application can temporarily stress a crop as the plant processes the chemistry.

Even a properly timed and labeled herbicide application can create a temporary response in the plant.

That does not mean the herbicide is bad.

Weeds can create significantly more yield loss than the temporary stress caused by controlling them.

The question is not whether we should eliminate every stressor.

The question is whether we can better prepare the plant to manage necessary and predictable stress.

Not All Stress Is Bad

Stress is a normal part of plant growth.

A perfectly stress-free environment does not exist in the field.

In fact, some stress is necessary for normal plant development. A plant responds to wind, temperature, moisture, sunlight, and countless other environmental signals throughout the season.

The environment is stress.

The plant's job is to manage it.

Problems begin when the stress load becomes greater than the plant's ability to respond.

Extreme heat, drought, high salt concentrations, disease pressure, and even certain management practices can add to that load.

This is where understanding SAR becomes useful.

Instead of waiting until the plant is visibly struggling, producers can begin identifying periods when stress is likely and make management decisions around those windows.

ISR Starts With the Soil

While SAR is a more direct defense response, induced systemic resistance, or ISR, brings the conversation back to soil health.

The longevity of a farm is closely connected to the health of its soil.

Carbon plays a major role because it supports biological life within the soil. Bacteria, fungi, and other organisms interact with plant roots and influence how the plant grows, accesses nutrients, and prepares for stress.

This is why soil health cannot be reduced to one product or one application.

It is a system.

Keeping living plants in the field longer can support biological activity. Cover crops may fit some operations. Better water management can improve soil conditions.