Farms.com Home   News

Measure what matters

As the fall season wraps up, Kansas State University cow-calf specialist Jason Warner encourages cattle producers to consider tracking a few key numbers to help them make more informed management decisions for the year ahead.

“It’s a great time to come back and take a look at the metrics we are seeing with a given group of cows and females to help navigate decision making,” Warner said.

Warner outlined three primary metrics producers should consider when reviewing herd data this season -- conception percentage, calving percentage and weaning percentage.

Warner said the first step is determining conception rate, which begins with identifying how many females were exposed to breeding and how many became pregnant.

“The first thing is what is your conception percentage?” Warner said. “It is being able to identify what that group was exposed to breeding and the number pregnant — what’s that percentage?”

Understanding conception rate provides an important foundation for reproductive efficiency and helps identify potential issues with nutrition, bull performance or environmental factors that may have affected breeding outcomes.

Next, producers should look at the number of calves born relative to the number of cows confirmed pregnant.

“We want to know how many cows calved, dead or alive,” Warner said. “We also want to know what degree of pregnancy loss we have. Typically, that’s about two percent to three percent.”

Tracking calving percentage allows producers to monitor herd health and pregnancy loss, giving insight into calving management practices and environmental or disease-related challenges.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

How Can We Grow More Food With Less Impact?

Video: How Can We Grow More Food With Less Impact?

For over two decades, Dr. Mitloehner has been at the forefront of research on how animal agriculture affects our air and our climate. With deep expertise in emissions and volatile organic compounds, his work initially focused on air quality in regions like California’s Central Valley—home to both the nation’s richest agricultural output and some of its poorest air quality.

In recent years, methane has taken center stage in climate discourse—not just scientifically, but politically. Once a topic reserved for technical discussions about manure management and feed efficiency, it has become a flashpoint in debates over sustainability, regulation, and even the legitimacy of livestock farming itself.

Dr. Frank Mitloehner, Professor and Air Quality Specialist with the CLEAR Center sits down with Associate Director for Communications at the CLEAR Center, Joe Proudman.