Time Running Out to Avoid Trade Retaliation Over M-COOL

Aug 26, 2015

By Bruce Cochrane

The National Pork Producers Council warns time is running out for the United States to avoid trade retaliation from Canada and Mexico related to U.S. Mandatory Country of Origin Labelling, and is urging swift Congressional action to repeal the meat labelling provisions of the law.

In May, the World Trade Organization rejected the final appeal of previous rulings that Mandatory COOL discriminates against imported livestock, opening the door for Canada and Mexico to apply to impose retaliatory tariffs on imported U.S. products.

National Pork Producers Council Trade Committee chair and past president Dr. Howard Hill says the WTO will meet soon to look at the tariffs that Canada and Mexico want to impose, those tariffs will go into place and it will be very damaging to the pork industry, as well as all of the other commodities on the retaliation list.

Dr. Howard-National Pork Producers Council:
We're working hard to see if we can get total repeal of COOL.
When it comes to Canadian food safety and U.S. food safety, they're comparable, they're equal, so we really don't think that people would choose one over the other necessarily in the market place if it was labelled.

We're not against labelling.
If somebody wants to label, that's fine.

We just don't want it to impact the price like it's going to here where you've got this mandatory labelling, even the voluntary labelling now that they're suggesting.

If the Canadians don't accept it, it's going to have the same effect as if we had mandatory labelling.

Dr. Hill says its all about timing now.
He notes the WTO will listen soon to the Canadian and Mexican arguments on tariff levels, and if the legislation hasn't been fixed, those tariffs will be implemented almost immediately after.

Source: Farmscape

Video: Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG emissions) in the Canadian swine sector found that CH4 emissions from manure were the largest contributor to the overall emissions, followed by emissions from energy use and crop production.

This innovative project, "Improving Swine Manure-Digestate Management Practices Towards Carbon Neutrality With Net Zero Emission Concepts," from Dr. Rajinikanth Rajagopal, under Swine Cluster 4, seeks to develop strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

While the management of manure can be very demanding and expensive for swine operations, it can also be viewed as an opportunity for GHG mitigation, as manure storage is an emission source built and managed by swine producers. Moreover, the majority of CH4 emissions from manure occur during a short period of time in the summer, which can potentially be mitigated with targeted intervention.

In tandem with understanding baseline emissions, Dr. Rajagopal's work focuses on evaluating emission mitigation options. Manure additives have the potential of reducing manure methane emissions. Additives can be deployed relatively quickly, enabling near-term emission reductions while biodigesters are being built. Furthermore, additives can be a long-term solution at farms where biogas is not feasible (e.g., when it’s too far from a central digester). Similarly, after biodigestion, additives can also be used to further reduce emissions from storage to minimize the carbon intensity of the bioenergy.