USDA Relocation Plan Will Save About $4 Billion, Officials Say

Aug 04, 2025

By Ryan Hanrahan

Government Executive’s Eric Katz reported that “the Agriculture Department is confident its push to move more employees out of Washington and into five new hubs around the country will retain most staff and large-scale layoffs will not be necessary, a top official told lawmakers on Wednesday.”

“The plan is not yet finalized and still subject to change, USDA Deputy Secretary Stephen Vaden repeatedly stressed to members of the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee, and the department is only now starting to solicit feedback from employees, stakeholders and lawmakers,” Katz reported. “Ultimately, Vaden said, the most significant goal of the reorganization is to build the next generation of leadership for USDA through the career ranks.”

“USDA announced last week it would relocate 2,600 Washington-based employees to its five new hubs and consolidate dozens of offices. It will close one of its headquarters buildings and three additional offices in the Washington area,” Katz reported. “In the plan, Secretary Brooke Rollins said reductions in force would be utilized ‘if needed,’ without specifying what would lead to their deployment.”

Agri-Pulse’s Steve Davies reported that “Vaden said the department would be saving about $4 billion from the deferred resignation program and building closures, including the Ag South Building in Washington – $1.9 billion from the DRPs and $2.2 billion in deferred maintenance on the buildings, which also include Braddock Place in suburban Alexandria, Virginia, and the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center in suburban Maryland.”

“The $4 billion is the ‘baseline’ of savings before considering the lower cost of living for employees and lower lease rates, he said,” according to Davies’ reporting.

Why Regional Hub Locations Were Chosen

Katz reported that “USDA’s new hubs will be located in Raleigh, North Carolina; Kansas City, Missouri; Indianapolis; Fort Collins, Colorado; and Salt Lake City, Utah. The locations generated some pushback from senators in both parties, who noted none of the top five agricultural states were chosen.”

Progressive Farmer’s Jerry Hagstrom reported that “the No. 1 reason that the Trump administration has chosen the five hub locations is the cost of living, Vaden said. He explained that decision through the ‘story’ of Ralph Linden, currently the USDA acting general counsel. He said Linden had moved to the Washington area in 1982 and bought a house in suburban Virginia. At that time, the other residents were government employees, but today, the houses cost ‘seven figures,’ and Linden’s neighbors are two-income households composed of doctors, lawyers and lobbyists.”

“In the hub communities, government employees will be able to afford homes and ‘grow and expand their families,’ Vaden said,” according to Hagstrom’s reporting.

Source : illinois.edu

Video: Spring 2026 weather outlook for Wisconsin; What an early-arriving El Niño could mean

Northeast Wisconsin is a small corner of the world, but our weather is still affected by what happens across the globe.

That includes in the equatorial Pacific, where changes between El Niño and La Niña play a role in the weather here -- and boy, have there been some abrupt changes as of late.

El Niño and La Niña are the two phases of what is collectively known as the El Niño Southern Oscillation, or ENSO for short. These are the swings back and forth from unusually warm to unusually cold sea surface temperatures in the Pacific Ocean along the equator.

Since this past September, we have been in a weak La Niña, which means water temperatures near the Eastern Pacific equator have been cooler than usual. That's where we're at right now.

Even last fall, the long-term outlook suggested a return to neutral conditions by spring and potentially El Niño conditions by summer.

But there are some signs this may be happening faster than usual, which could accelerate the onset of El Niño.

Over the last few weeks, unusually strong bursts of westerly winds farther west in the Pacific -- where sea surface temperatures are warmer than average -- have been observed. There is a chance that this could accelerate the warming of those eastern Pacific waters and potentially push us into El Niño sooner than usual.

If we do enter El Nino by spring -- which we'll define as the period of March, April and May -- there are some long-term correlations with our weather here in Northeast Wisconsin.

Looking at a map of anomalously warm weather, most of the upper Great Lakes doesn't show a strong correlation, but in general, the northern tiers of the United States do tend to lean to that direction.

The stronger correlation is with precipitation. El Niño conditions in spring have historically come with a higher risk of very dry weather over that time frame, so this will definitely be a transition we'll have to watch closely as we move out of winter.