Farms.com Home   Ag Industry News

Changes announced to Saskatchewan’s Premises Identification program

Participation in the program is becoming mandatory

By Diego Flammini
Assistant Editor, North American Content
Farms.com

Changes to Saskatchewan’s Premises Identification (PID) program mean participation in the program is becoming mandatory for producers in the province.

The voluntary PID program launched in June 2014 and currently less than 3,000 of Saskatchewan’s livestock and poultry producers, veterinarians, feedlots and other livestock sites are enrolled, according to the Province’s Ministry of Agriculture.

Producers in Manitoba and Alberta are already required to participate in similar PID programs. Officials in Saskatchewan say the new regulations can help ensure livestock remain healthy and accounted for.

“Premises Identification is an important part of ensuring the health and safety of our province’s livestock,” said Saskatchewan Minister of Agriculture Lyle Stewart in a release.  “With a full PID database, we’ll be in a better position to prevent or respond to an animal disease outbreak or natural disaster.”

The database allows for planning and the implementation of emergency responses during animal health concerns, natural disasters and other incidents where livestock could be impacted.

For producers who invest tremendously into their cattle, registering for a PID number can give them peace of mind.

“I want to make sure I’m in the best position possible to protect my cattle if a disease outbreak happens,” Rick Toney, Saskatchewan Cattlemen’s Association vice-chair, said in the release.  “That’s why registering for a PID number just made sense; it was an easy way to make sure my cattle would be safe in an emergency.”

Producers can complete their registration online at http://premisesid.saskatchewan.ca.


Trending Video

Will the 2025 USDA December Crop Report Be a Market Mover/Surprise?

Video: Will the 2025 USDA December Crop Report Be a Market Mover/Surprise?


Historically, the USDA December crop report is a non-event or another dud report as the USDA reserves any final supply changes to the final report in January of the following year in this case 2026. But after the longest U.S. government shutdown in history at 43 days and no October crop report will they provide more data/surprise and make an exception?
Our China U.S. soybean purchase tracker is now at 26.6% or a total of 3.2 mmt but for traders it’s taking too long to unfold.
The final Stats Canada production report was bearish canola and wheat projection a record crop in both (it adds to the global glut of supplies) and bullish local corn and soybean prices in Ontario/Quebec thanks to a drought. It will not help the fund flow short-term, the USDA may need to offset it?
A U.S. Fed interest rate cut of another 25-basis point next Wednesday (probability 87.1%) could help fund flow and sentiment in stock and ag commodities into year end.
More inflows into Bitcoin this past week saw prices rebound back above 90,000 with support at 82,000 and resistance at 96,000.
A V-shaped bottom in cattle suggest the lows are in after Mexico reported another new world screwworm case. Lower weights, seasonal demand and higher U.S. beef select/choice values with a continued closure of the Mexican border to cattle will result in a resumption of higher cattle futures into yearend.
Australia is expected to produce its 3rd largest wheat crop ever at 36 mmt adding to the global glut of supplies.
Reports of ASF in hogs in Spain the largest pork exporter in Europe could see the U.S. win more pork export business long-term.
If the rains verify into next week of 3-5 inches for Brazil it would go a long way to fixing the dry regions from the last 2-months, but the European weather model has been wrong for the past 2-months!
Natural gas futures are surging to the 3rd price count as frigid hold temps set in.
CDN $ is also surging to end the week on a very resilient economy and better employment numbers suggesting no interest rate cuts next week.
Finally, the CFTC report showed funds were net buyers of soybeans but sellers of corn, canola and wheat. In real time the funds have gone back to selling as they take some profits.