NPPC calls for USDA oversight

 

Staff Writer

Farms.com

 

The National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) is again asking the U.S. Department of Agriculture for regulatory oversight of livestock gene editing.

 

NPPC’s request follows the stall in the “development of an emerging technology promising major animal health and environmental benefits” at the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA), an NPPC release said Thursday. 

 

The FDA has regulatory authority over gene editing in livestock but no statutory obligation. FDA oversight will “treat any gene-edited animal as a living animal drug – and every farm raising them a drug manufacturing facility,” the release said. This approach reduces the competitiveness of U.S. agriculture in comparison to other countries with more progressive gene editing regulatory policies, NPPC said. 

 

The FDA’s pace in handling the gene-editing regulations reinforces the belief that the USDA is best equipped to oversee this work, Jim Heimerl, NPPC president and pork producer from Ohio, said in the release.

 

“U.S. agriculture is one our nation’s most successful export products; we can’t afford to cede leadership of gene editing to other countries,” he said. 

 

This new technology offers many benefits for the ag industry, said Dr. Dan Kovich, NPPC director of science and technology. 

 

“In addition to dramatic animal health gains and reduced financial risk for farmers, gene editing’s promise includes less need to use antibiotics to care for livestock and reduced environmental impact from more efficient farm operations,” he said in the release.

 

Scientists can use gene editing to make simple changes in a pig’s native genetic structure without exposing it to genes from a different species. The process is also faster than traditional breeding practices for trait selection.

 

For example, new applications of gene editing include raising pigs to be resistant to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome, a highly contagious disease. 

 

Farms.com has reached out to NPPC for comment.

 

 

Video: Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG emissions) in the Canadian swine sector found that CH4 emissions from manure were the largest contributor to the overall emissions, followed by emissions from energy use and crop production.

This innovative project, "Improving Swine Manure-Digestate Management Practices Towards Carbon Neutrality With Net Zero Emission Concepts," from Dr. Rajinikanth Rajagopal, under Swine Cluster 4, seeks to develop strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

While the management of manure can be very demanding and expensive for swine operations, it can also be viewed as an opportunity for GHG mitigation, as manure storage is an emission source built and managed by swine producers. Moreover, the majority of CH4 emissions from manure occur during a short period of time in the summer, which can potentially be mitigated with targeted intervention.

In tandem with understanding baseline emissions, Dr. Rajagopal's work focuses on evaluating emission mitigation options. Manure additives have the potential of reducing manure methane emissions. Additives can be deployed relatively quickly, enabling near-term emission reductions while biodigesters are being built. Furthermore, additives can be a long-term solution at farms where biogas is not feasible (e.g., when it’s too far from a central digester). Similarly, after biodigestion, additives can also be used to further reduce emissions from storage to minimize the carbon intensity of the bioenergy.