SARM seeks support from Sask. government after wildfire

Nov 01, 2017

Farmers in recovery mode following devastating fire

Staff Reporter

Farms.com

The Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities (SARM) will ask the provincial government to provide additional support for farmers affected by the fire.

Two weeks ago, 34,000 hectares of southwest Saskatchewan went up in flames. The fire left around 770 cattle dead and many farmland assets, such as barns and storage bins, destroyed. As a result, some farmers are forced to rebuild, according to yesterday’s Regina Leader-Post article.

But the Provincial Disaster Assistance Program does not currently cover losses caused by fires or fire-related costs.

“We want to try and be able to understand why that is and perhaps maybe that’s something that could be included,” Ray Orb, SARM president, said in the article. This issue will be discussed at the SARM midterm convention next week.

Farmers are in the initial stages of recovering from the expansive damages.

“It’s completely devastating to the producers and I think they’re just starting to come to grips with the loss,” Chad MacPherson, general manager of the Saskatchewan Stock Growers Association, said in the article.

In the first week, the association’s wildfire relief campaign raised about $200,000 in donations of money, feed, hay, labour, fencing materials and trucking services, the article stated. Previous coverage of the association’s fundraising efforts can be found here.

Despite the devastation, communities are rallying and supporting each other through this difficult time.

There have been large crowds at fundraising events and Justin LaBrash, a Saskatchewan country artist, is playing in Cabri on Saturday night to raise money for those affected by the wildfire. More information on the event can be found here.

It will be a long and expensive road to full recovery, however. Fencing costs more than $5,000 per mile and farmers lost over $1 million worth of cattle, according to Macpherson. Also, the scorched pasture land may take up to three years to replenish.

Soil erosion has also been an issue. Fertile topsoil is blowing off fields because of the dry and windy conditions, Orb said. Farmers are doing what they can to preserve the soil.

Video: Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG emissions) in the Canadian swine sector found that CH4 emissions from manure were the largest contributor to the overall emissions, followed by emissions from energy use and crop production.

This innovative project, "Improving Swine Manure-Digestate Management Practices Towards Carbon Neutrality With Net Zero Emission Concepts," from Dr. Rajinikanth Rajagopal, under Swine Cluster 4, seeks to develop strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

While the management of manure can be very demanding and expensive for swine operations, it can also be viewed as an opportunity for GHG mitigation, as manure storage is an emission source built and managed by swine producers. Moreover, the majority of CH4 emissions from manure occur during a short period of time in the summer, which can potentially be mitigated with targeted intervention.

In tandem with understanding baseline emissions, Dr. Rajagopal's work focuses on evaluating emission mitigation options. Manure additives have the potential of reducing manure methane emissions. Additives can be deployed relatively quickly, enabling near-term emission reductions while biodigesters are being built. Furthermore, additives can be a long-term solution at farms where biogas is not feasible (e.g., when it’s too far from a central digester). Similarly, after biodigestion, additives can also be used to further reduce emissions from storage to minimize the carbon intensity of the bioenergy.