Farms.com Home   Ag Industry News

Small Plastics, Big Risks for Cattle

Small Plastics, Big Risks for Cattle
Dec 01, 2025
By Farms.com

Study shows plastic particles alter rumen fermentation and microbe activity

A new international study reveals that microplastics, tiny plastic particles commonly found in agricultural environments, can interfere with the rumen—the first stomach chamber in cattle. The research team from the University of Helsinki, University of Zurich, University of Hohenheim, and Technical University of Munich shows that these plastics actively interact with rumen microbes instead of simply passing through the digestive system. 

The study tested five types of microplastics often detected in farm settings: PLA, PHB, HDPE, PVC, and PP. These plastics were mixed with cow rumen fluid and hay or barley in a controlled laboratory system to observe how they affected fermentation and microbial behavior. Various particle sizes and doses were used to understand different levels of exposure. 

Researchers discovered that all plastic types changed normal rumen fermentation. Microplastics consistently reduced cumulative gas production, which is an important sign of fermentation efficiency. They also increased dry-matter disappearance, suggesting that rumen microbes may break down part of the plastic into smaller pieces. Smaller fragments may enter animal tissues more easily, raising concerns for food safety. 

Barley-based incubations showed major shifts in microbial activity. Proteins linked to stress increased, while those related to energy and nutrient metabolism decreased. This pattern is typical of a stressed microbial community, which may affect cattle health and overall productivity. 

The findings show that farm animals are not passive consumers of microplastic-contaminated feed. Their digestive systems may act as biological reactors that transform plastics, potentially spreading smaller fragments through agricultural systems. This creates concerns for animal wellbeing and the safety of meat and dairy products. 

Researchers emphasize the need to reduce plastic contamination from sources such as silage wraps, packaging materials, and sewage sludge. They also call for stronger monitoring systems to detect plastics in feed, manure, and animal products. The results highlight the importance of studying how microplastics affect other farm animals as well. 

Photo Credit: gettyimages-jacqueline-nix


Trending Video

Advancing Swine Disease Traceability: USDA's No-Cost RFID Tag Program for Market Channels

Video: Advancing Swine Disease Traceability: USDA's No-Cost RFID Tag Program for Market Channels

On-demand webinar, hosted by the Meat Institute, experts from the USDA, National Pork Board (NPB) and Merck Animal Health introduced the no-cost 840 RFID tag program—a five-year initiative supported through African swine fever (ASF) preparedness efforts. Beginning in Fall 2025, eligible sow producers, exhibition swine owners and State Animal Health Officials can order USDA-funded RFID tags through Merck A2025-10_nimal Health.

NPB staff also highlighted an additional initiative, funded by USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Veterinary Services through NPB, that helps reduce the cost of transitioning to RFID tags across the swine industry and strengthens national traceability efforts.

Topics Covered:

•USDA’s RFID tag initiative background and current traceability practices

•How to access and order no-cost 840 RFID tags

•Equipment support for tag readers and panels

•Implementation timelines for market and cull sow channels How RFID improves ASF preparedness an