Farms.com Home   News

Effect of Antimicrobial Use in Agricultural Animals on Drugresistant Foodborne Campylobacteriosis in Humans: A Systematic Literature Review

Controversy continues concerning antimicrobial use in food animals and its relationship to drug-resistant infections in humans. We systematically reviewed published literature for evidence of a relationship between antimicrobial use in agricultural animals and drug-resistant foodborne campylobacteriosis in humans. Based on publications from the United States (U.S.), Canada and Denmark from 2010 to July 2014, 195 articles were retained for abstract review, 50 met study criteria for full article review with 36 retained for which data are presented. Two publications reported increase in macrolide resistance of Campylobacter coli isolated from feces of swine receiving macrolides in feed, and one of these described similar findings for tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones. A study in growing turkeys demonstrated increased macrolide resistance associated with therapeutic dosing with Tylan_ in drinking water. One publication linked tetracycline-resistant C. jejuni clone SA in raw cow’s milk to a foodborne outbreak in humans. No studies that identified farm antimicrobial use also traced antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter from farm to fork. Recent literature confirms that on farm antibiotic selection pressure can increase colonization of animals with drug-resistant Campylobacter spp. but is inadequately detailed to establish a causal relationship between use of antimicrobials in agricultural animals and prevalence of drug-resistant foodborne campylobacteriosis in humans.

Source: AASV


Trending Video

Evaluation of Split Suckling on Lifetime Growth Performance and Mortality

Video: Evaluation of Split Suckling on Lifetime Growth Performance and Mortality

In this video, Mikayla Spinler, Kansas State University, explains the findings of her research trial evaluating the effects of split suckling on piglet growth performance and mortality. This study compared two different split suckling strategies—based on birth order and birth weight—to a control group with no split suckling.