Farms.com Home   News

Texas Flooding Causes Cattle Losses

Texas Flooding Causes Cattle Losses

By Russ Quinn and Todd Neeley

 Severe flooding in the panhandle of Texas has caused cattle losses in the largest cattle feeding region of the country.

Ben Weinheimer, president and CEO of the Texas Cattle Feeders Association, told DTN producers in the Hereford area as of Wednesday were unsure about the extent of the livestock losses.

"The outpouring of support for our members has been tremendous and we are so thankful," Weinheimer said.

"We're still working to move water and it could be a few more days before we know the full extent of losses and damages. However, the severity of the flooding caused by this unprecedented natural disaster has been devastating and we're working to do everything we can to support our members during this difficult time."

Laura L. Lopez, media and community relations manager at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, said the commission has been focusing its efforts on helping cleanup at the Circle 3 Feed Yard in Hereford. Circle 3 operates a 25,000-head facility.

"The TCEQ Amarillo office is providing assistance to the Circle 3 Feed Yard to ensure that dead livestock and any other debris are disposed of in accordance with TCEQ rules and regulations," Lopez told DTN.

"TCEQ cannot confirm the number of potential cattle lost," she said.

John Robinson, senior vice-present for communications for the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, told DTN the worst of the flooding happened in the Hereford area. Several large feedyards are located in the Hereford area, he said.

While all of the feedyards in the region saw large amounts of rain, only one saw significant flooding, he said. This was a smaller, family-owned facility. This feedyard was located in a low area with a nearby river, which caused the flooding, he said.

"Reports from the area that most all of the floodwaters have now receded," Robinson said.

Robinson added it is difficult to assess how much cattle were lost in the flooding, but he did say social media accounts of mass losses were inaccurate.

Reb Wayne, director of communications at the Texas Department of Agriculture told DTN on Wednesday that officials hope to have a cattle-loss estimate soon.

"Undoubtedly, there will also be crop losses as planting on a number of crops in the area had just been completed," Wayne said. "Drinking water is the immediate concern and issue."

ShayLe Stewart, DTN livestock analyst, said as of Tuesday afternoon death toll counts have been estimated to range anywhere from 3,000 to 10,000 head. This event could have a short-term effect on the cattle, she said.

"This could potentially have a positive effect on the cattle market in the immediate future as front-end supplies of market ready cattle are desperately thin," Stewart said.

"But long term this won't have an effect on the market as 10,000 head only accounts for 1.6% of the market's weekly slaughter production on a week where roughly 620,000 head are processed."

DTN Ag Meteorologist John Baranick said much of the rainfall fell Friday night into Saturday morning. It wasn't a huge thunderstorm, but it just sat on top of the Hereford area and it really did not move much.

Rainfall totals were estimated to be several inches in a fairly short period of time, with Hereford estimated to have received up to 10 inches of rain. "The city got it bad," Baranick said.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Video: Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG emissions) in the Canadian swine sector found that CH4 emissions from manure were the largest contributor to the overall emissions, followed by emissions from energy use and crop production.

This innovative project, "Improving Swine Manure-Digestate Management Practices Towards Carbon Neutrality With Net Zero Emission Concepts," from Dr. Rajinikanth Rajagopal, under Swine Cluster 4, seeks to develop strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

While the management of manure can be very demanding and expensive for swine operations, it can also be viewed as an opportunity for GHG mitigation, as manure storage is an emission source built and managed by swine producers. Moreover, the majority of CH4 emissions from manure occur during a short period of time in the summer, which can potentially be mitigated with targeted intervention.

In tandem with understanding baseline emissions, Dr. Rajagopal's work focuses on evaluating emission mitigation options. Manure additives have the potential of reducing manure methane emissions. Additives can be deployed relatively quickly, enabling near-term emission reductions while biodigesters are being built. Furthermore, additives can be a long-term solution at farms where biogas is not feasible (e.g., when it’s too far from a central digester). Similarly, after biodigestion, additives can also be used to further reduce emissions from storage to minimize the carbon intensity of the bioenergy.