Government Covers Planned School Milk Price Increase

Jun 15, 2022

Amid rising food costs, the government will cover a planned price increase in the School Milk Program to ensure milk stays affordable for families when students return to classrooms in September.

“The rising cost of food is a real challenge for many Nova Scotia families,” said Agriculture Minister Greg Morrow. “We know that our dairy producers and processors are seeing their costs rise, too. By covering the cost of the planned increase, we’re able to support the industry while giving parents one less thing to worry about when the school year starts again.”

The Natural Products Marketing Council, a sector-led adjudicative board, sets the price of school milk. There was a price increase scheduled for September 1, but the government has agreed to cover that cost so families don’t have to. That means the price of a 250-millilitre carton of milk at school will remain at 40 cents.

The cost of covering this increase is estimated to be about $72,000. This is in addition to current costs, which have ranged between $130,000 and $230,000 per full school year. These costs were lower during the 2019-20 and 2020-21 school years due to pandemic-related school closures.

The School Milk Program is cost shared between the Department of Agriculture and dairy producers and processors. Since 1974, the program has provided milk at a reduced price to students in grades primary to 12 at participating public schools.

Source : Novascotia.ca

Video: Swine Industry Advances: Biodigesters Lower Emissions and Increase Profits

Analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG emissions) in the Canadian swine sector found that CH4 emissions from manure were the largest contributor to the overall emissions, followed by emissions from energy use and crop production.

This innovative project, "Improving Swine Manure-Digestate Management Practices Towards Carbon Neutrality With Net Zero Emission Concepts," from Dr. Rajinikanth Rajagopal, under Swine Cluster 4, seeks to develop strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.

While the management of manure can be very demanding and expensive for swine operations, it can also be viewed as an opportunity for GHG mitigation, as manure storage is an emission source built and managed by swine producers. Moreover, the majority of CH4 emissions from manure occur during a short period of time in the summer, which can potentially be mitigated with targeted intervention.

In tandem with understanding baseline emissions, Dr. Rajagopal's work focuses on evaluating emission mitigation options. Manure additives have the potential of reducing manure methane emissions. Additives can be deployed relatively quickly, enabling near-term emission reductions while biodigesters are being built. Furthermore, additives can be a long-term solution at farms where biogas is not feasible (e.g., when it’s too far from a central digester). Similarly, after biodigestion, additives can also be used to further reduce emissions from storage to minimize the carbon intensity of the bioenergy.