Farms.com Home   News

Kansas Wheat Crop Update

The 2018-2019 Kansas wheat crop is a study in contrast, with essentially two separate crops (Figure 1). About 50% of the Kansas wheat crop was planted in a timely manner and benefited from ample fall moisture. These fields are usually well developed and, with the ample profile moisture, likely have a high yield potential. However, October was extremely wet with all parts of the state recording at least ¾ of an inch more than normal. Parts of south central and central Kansas had between 5 and 11 inches greater than average. This rainfall delayed sowing of the remaining half of the wheat area in the majority of the state, resulting in the slowest sowing pace since 1994 (Figure 2). The delayed sowing resulted in a less-developed crop going into the winter, often with only the first leaf out, which becomes more susceptible to potential winterkill due to less fall tillering and less time to acclimate to cold conditions. Also, the yield of the late sown-crop will depend more on spring-formed tillers, which are typically less productive. Thus, the yield potential of this crop might be compromised, unless conditions during grain filling have below-normal temperatures and above-normal precipitation.
 
Figure 1. Wheat crop planted early (left panel) versus late (right panel). The late-planted crop is now showing about 2-3 leaves per plant, and just initiating the first tiller.
 
Figure 2. Wheat planting progress in 2018 (dotted line) as compared to the 1994-2017 mean (solid line) and range (purple area). A new record was set for late planting after October 5th.
 
Air temperatures
 
Mean air temperatures during the 2018-19 winter wheat growing season have been below the long-term normal for the majority of Kansas during both fall and winter (Figure 3).
 
Figure 3.  Departure from normal temperatures (Weather Data Library).
 
Temperatures were between 1 and 5 degrees F below-normal during October, which delayed development, and 11.3 degrees F below-normal during February, having a substantial impact on soil temperatures within the seed zone (Figure 4). Cooler temperatures during the fall decreased canopy and root development. The crop could potentially have benefited from slightly warmer temperatures to enhance tillering, fall canopy closure, and crown root elongation. Additionally, it will also likely delay spring development. In a year where weather conditions are close to normal, the crop would be at about the first hollow stem stage of development in Hutchinson now (early-to-mid March). However, with cooler air and soil conditions, the crop has not initiated spring growth yet.
 
Figure 4.  2019 soil temperatures compared to climatology at the Hutchinson 10SW Kansas Mesonet station. Record low temperatures are being recorded the first week of March.
 
Precipitation
 
Rain and snowfall over the winter continues to keep soils saturated at the surface in near-record amounts. While this provides ample moisture for the winter crops – it isn’t being utilized yet due to frozen soils (see accompanying eUpdate article on field working conditions). This above-average precipitation and moist soils will also affect decisions regarding fertilizer topdressing to the wheat crop (see accompanying eUpdate article on N management for wheat). Warm temperatures are needed to initiate plant growth to begin uptake of the above normal precipitation the last six months. Forecasted temperatures for the remainder of the month and into April aren’t conducive for the crop to begin growth.
 

Trending Video

Wheat Yields in USA and China Threatened by Heat Waves Breaking Enzymes

Video: Wheat Yields in USA and China Threatened by Heat Waves Breaking Enzymes

A new peer reviewed study looks at the generally unrecognized risk of heat waves surpassing the threshold for enzyme damage in wheat.

Most studies that look at crop failure in the main food growing regions (breadbaskets of the planet) look at temperatures and droughts in the historical records to assess present day risk. Since the climate system has changed, these historical based risk analysis studies underestimate the present-day risks.

What this new research study does is generate an ensemble of plausible scenarios for the present climate in terms of temperatures and precipitation, and looks at how many of these plausible scenarios exceed the enzyme-breaking temperature of 32.8 C for wheat, and exceed the high stress yield reducing temperature of 27.8 C for wheat. Also, the study considers the possibility of a compounded failure with heat waves in both regions simultaneously, this greatly reducing global wheat supply and causing severe shortages.

Results show that the likelihood (risk) of wheat crop failure with a one-in-hundred likelihood in 1981 has in today’s climate become increased by 16x in the USA winter wheat crop (to one-in-six) and by 6x in northeast China (to one-in-sixteen).

The risks determined in this new paper are much greater than that obtained in previous work that determines risk by analyzing historical climate patterns.

Clearly, since the climate system is rapidly changing, we cannot assume stationarity and calculate risk probabilities like we did traditionally before.

We are essentially on a new planet, with a new climate regime, and have to understand that everything is different now.