Farms.com Home   News

Long-term Study of Legacy Phosphorus

Phosphorus is a chemical element essential for life. Without adequate phosphorus, plant growth and crop yield are reduced. As plants grow, they remove phosphorus from the soil, which is subsequently removed from fields when crops are harvested. As a result, fertilizers containing phosphorus compounds are often added to soil.

However, fertilizer phosphorus added beyond the crop’s yearly needs can remain in the soil, and can become more tightly bound to soil than recently added fertilizer. Not much is known about the availability of “residual phosphorus” or “legacy phosphorus” to plants. Because it is more tightly bound, it may not show up in “soil test phosphorus” analyses that measure readily available soil inorganic phosphorus to determine fertilizer requirements. So researchers at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) are investigating legacy phosphorus in studies at various locations across Canada, through a phosphorus project led by Dr. Noura Ziadi at AAFC-Ste. Foy.

“The availability of long-term plots is key to studying new problems as they develop, such as the potential over-application of phosphorus fertilizers. While it’s well known that not all the fertilizer given to plants will be used, what we don’t know is how fertilizer compounds in the soil interact with the other soil elements, microbes and plants over time.”

- Dr. Barbara Cade-Menun, Research Scientist, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

One study in this phosphorus project is led by Dr. Barbara Cade-Menun at the Semiarid Prairie Agricultural Research Centre (SPARC) in Swift Current, Saskatchewan. Her team is studying a set of agricultural plots that were established in 1967. Until 1995 these plots received both phosphorus and nitrogen fertilizer, but then each was split in two so that phosphorus treatments could be stopped on one half of each plot. The result is a long-term, controlled study of legacy phosphorus.

What has surprized the researchers is the growth of the wheat plants on the plots not fertilized by phosphorus: although tests showed very low concentrations of soil test phosphorus on the no-phosphorus plots, there was no difference in yield, or in grain phosphorus concentration as compared to the fertilized plot. The plants that did not receive additional fertilizer were able to use both the legacy fertilizer phosphorus, as well as other pools of the phosphorus that had accumulated in the soil, such as organic phosphorus from decaying plant material.

While this research will need to be replicated with other crops in other soil and environmental conditions, it suggests that farmers might be able to change the way they think about phosphorous fertilizer. Accessing existing phosphorous from the soil would be a cost saving for the farmer and potentially reduce the risk of phosphorus loss into nearby water bodies.

Dr. Cade-Menun’s work was aided by the Saskatchewan Structural Sciences Centre at the University of Saskatchewan, as well as the Canadian Light Source Synchrotron.

AAFC is joining other organizations worldwide to celebrate the International Year of Soils 2015 and raise public awareness about the fundamental roles of soils in our daily lives. We are doing our part by leading research and development activities in agri-innovations to enhance both the economic and environmental sustainability of Canadian agriculture.

Key Discoveries

  • Over a 15 year period (1995-2010), wheat plants on plots at SPARC not fertilized by phosphorus yielded as well as plants given additional phosphorus fertilizer.
  • These plants were able to access legacy phosphorus that had built up in the soil, which brings into question current beliefs about the need for additional fertilizers.

Source: AAFC


Trending Video

USDA Shock/Surprises Markets in August Crop Report + Houston we have a problem in Ontario!

Video: USDA Shock/Surprises Markets in August Crop Report + Houston we have a problem in Ontario!


USDA August crop report shocked with higher U.S. crop yields and big changes in acres, but will diseases like Southern Rust in corn especially in Iowa take away?
If Trump gave China the AI chips it wanted, does China finally step in to buy U.S. soybeans and does Trump have a Phase 2 trade deal in his pocket for the Apec Summit when he meets Xi at the end of October?
Soybean futures rallied 68 cents the pendulum is swinging back to the upside as heat could shave the soybean yield for the 2nd half of August. Midway through the 2025 10th Annual Great ON Yield Tour, we have a problem as Central Ontario is a train wreck from a severe drought.
75% of the 700 wildfires in Canada remain out of control plus Canadian Prairie farmers took another one for the team as China slaps a 75.8% tariff on canola just in time for the 2025 harvest. Western Canadian rains too late for most.
U.S. pork cutout values remain resilient.
Does Trump have a Ukraine/Russian peace deal in his back pocket in Alaska?