Farms.com Home   News

Soil Nitrate-N Availability On Corn Fields Following Various Previous Crops

By Eric Anderson
 
Figure 1. Soil nitrate-N test results for eight fields in southern Michigan.
Figure 1. Soil nitrate-N test results for eight fields in southern Michigan.
Understanding how much nitrogen (N) your soil can supply to a crop in a given year via mineralization is important from an economic perspective and also from an environmental perspective. In fields where sources of mineralizable N are abundant—high levels of organic matter and microbial biomass and, in particular, fields where manure has been applied—much of the N needed by the crop can be supplied by the soil, which reduces the need for additional inputs of synthetic fertilizers or manure. Performing a pre-sidedress soil nitrate-N test (PSNT) can help growers identify how much N will be available in a given growing season.
 
Several fields in southern Michigan were sampled for this study. One field (Oshtemo County sandy loam) had 4,000 gallons of swine manure knifed in this spring and was subsequently chisel plowed, disked and planted to seed corn. Six fields (Kalamazoo County loam and Oshtemo County sandy loam) were previously under a red clover cover crop and one was previously under alfalfa, and all seven were no-till planted to field corn. Soil samples were taken from the top 12 inches with 20 samples pooled from each field during the first two weeks of June (see Michigan State University Extension article “Identifying fields and preparation work for pre-sidedress soil nitrate test” for more details on sampling protocols). In the fields previously under a clover cover crop, the clover did not establish uniformly, so care was taken to sample from areas of the field where cover had been heaviest.
 
Results are shown in Figure 1. Only two fields received N credit: the manured field had 27 ppm (no further N required, see Table 1) and one field previously in clover had 11 ppm nitrate-N (30 pounds N per acre credit). The high test value for the manured field was not surprising and confirms results from MSU Extension’s George Silva’s 2016 study. The low nitrate-N results for the clover fields may be due to a late kill of the clover resulting in tie-up of N and low levels of mineralization by the time samples were taken. The clover was sprayed in late April, but was not terminated due to cold weather, and it was not until an early post-emergence (mid- to late May) herbicide application that the cover crop was killed. Although it is possible to lose nitrate-N from lighter soils like these, it was not likely a factor this year as that location received near-normal rainfall from April 1 through June 15 (7.4 inches compared with the five-year average of 8.5 inches) and there were no particularly heavy rainfall events.
 

Table 1. Pre-sidedress soil nitrate test (PSNT) levels and their corresponding N credits and fertilization recommendations according to the Maximum Return to N (MRTN) approach.

PSNT Nitrate-N (ppm)

Soil N credit (lb/ac)

Recommendation

Less than or equal to 10

0

Use full N recommendation

11-15

30

Reduce fertilizer N rate slightly

16-20

60

Reduce fertilizer N rate

21-25

90

Reduce fertilizer N rate substantially

Greater than or equal to 26

Full credit

No additional fertilizer N needed

 
Using the PSNT to inform fertilization decisions, particularly when a reduction in further fertilizer applications is warranted, can seem risky to growers looking to “protect yield.” However, in tight economic times, farmers need to make tough decisions to maximize not just yield, but profit. When cutting back on N fertilizer rates, we recommend including strips of different fertility levels (e.g., including the full N credit, no credit and something in between) and then conducting an end-of-season stalk nitrate test to confirm whether any yield differences might be due to sufficiency of N fertility. Visit the MSU Extension website and type in “stalk nitrate” in the search box to see many articles describing the corn stalk nitrate test. 
 

Trending Video

Why Your Food Future Could be Trapped in a Seed Morgue

Video: Why Your Food Future Could be Trapped in a Seed Morgue

In a world of PowerPoint overload, Rex Bernardo stands out. No bullet points. No charts. No jargon. Just stories and photographs. At this year’s National Association for Plant Breeding conference on the Big Island of Hawaii, he stood before a room of peers — all experts in the science of seeds — and did something radical: he showed them images. He told them stories. And he asked them to remember not what they saw, but how they felt.

Bernardo, recipient of the 2025 Lifetime Achievement Award, has spent his career searching for the genetic treasures tucked inside what plant breeders call exotic germplasm — ancient, often wild genetic lines that hold secrets to resilience, taste, and traits we've forgotten to value.

But Bernardo didn’t always think this way.

“I worked in private industry for nearly a decade,” he recalls. “I remember one breeder saying, ‘We’re making new hybrids, but they’re basically the same genetics.’ That stuck with me. Where is the new diversity going to come from?”

For Bernardo, part of the answer lies in the world’s gene banks — vast vaults of seed samples collected from every corner of the globe. Yet, he says, many of these vaults have quietly become “seed morgues.” “Something goes in, but it never comes out,” he explains. “We need to start treating these collections like living investments, not museums of dead potential.”

That potential — and the barriers to unlocking it — are deeply personal for Bernardo. He’s wrestled with international policies that prevent access to valuable lines (like North Korean corn) and with the slow, painstaking science of transferring useful traits from wild relatives into elite lines that farmers can actually grow. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn’t. But he’s convinced that success starts not in the lab, but in the way we communicate.

“The fact sheet model isn’t cutting it anymore,” he says. “We hand out a paper about a new variety and think that’s enough. But stories? Plants you can see and touch? That’s what stays with people.”

Bernardo practices what he preaches. At the University of Minnesota, he helped launch a student-led breeding program that’s working to adapt leafy African vegetables for the Twin Cities’ African diaspora. The goal? Culturally relevant crops that mature in Minnesota’s shorter growing season — and can be regrown year after year.

“That’s real impact,” he says. “Helping people grow food that’s meaningful to them, not just what's commercially viable.”

He’s also brewed plant breeding into something more relatable — literally. Coffee and beer have become unexpected tools in his mission to make science accessible. His undergraduate course on coffee, for instance, connects the dots between genetics, geography, and culture. “Everyone drinks coffee,” he says. “It’s a conversation starter. It’s a gateway into plant science.”