Farms.com Home   News

Why Did Cover Crops Cause Issues in Minnesota the Last Two Years and What Should Growers Do Going Forward?

By Anna Cates and Angie Peltie

Cover crops are a key practice to improve soil health by building soil structure and adding organic matter outside the summer growing season. But there’s a real risk to cash crop productivity that must be managed when using cover crops. In the recent dry years in Minnesota, cover crops have caused a lot of crop stress and yield loss in cash crops. Why has this happened? How can we avoid this in the future?

What were the cover crop issues in 2022 and 2023?

The biggest reason cover crops caused yield drag the last couple years is a lack of soil moisture. Fall 2021 and 2022 were both very dry, so cover crops may have emerged spottily, or may not have emerged at all. Spring 2022 and 2023 were both wetter, so in some cases cover crops couldn’t be terminated on time. In other cases, growers waited in hopes of wicking up some of the (at that time) excess moisture, and that decision didn’t pan out well as summer rains were sparse in most parts of the state.

For example, at U of M cover crop research trials in west-central Minnesota, 2022 soybean planting was severely delayed by a month or longer due to wet conditions. Our treatments of cereal rye termination timing before, at, or after planting were accordingly delayed too, so the rye biomass grew much larger than we anticipated (Fig 1). When rye was terminated June 16-17, after soybean planting June 7-8, we saw rye biomass of over 4,000 lbs/ac at two on-farm sites (Fig 1), and over 7,000 lbs/ac at the West Central Research and Outreach Center in Morris. In most locations across western MN, this post-planting termination caused a soybean yield drag in 2022. One exception was a farm near Appleton, where, due to substantial residue left from the 2021 corn crop, rye only grew to 384 lbs/ac, which had no effect on soybean yield.


Figure 1: On-farm research plots in Browns Valley, MN, showing cover crop biomass on June 21, 2022.

Figure 1: On-farm research plots in Browns Valley, MN, showing cover crop biomass on June 21, 2022.

If we had gotten rain throughout the 2022 growing season, we might not have seen a yield hit even at 4,000 lbs/ac. We ran the same trial at the Northwest Research and Outreach Center in Crookston, and up to 2300 lbs/ac of biomass caused no soybean yield drag. That area received much more normal precipitation in May, got planted earlier, and after a dry June had normal July rainfall, so water stress was less of an issue. We rarely see cover crop biomass numbers that high in MN, but if you’re looking for weed suppression from cover crops, you might need around 3,500 lbs/ac to get 50% weed suppression.

The precipitation story in 2023 was similar to 2022 in many parts of the state: a wet spring made it hard to terminate the cover crop early, and then there was very little rain in the early growing season to replenish what the cover crop had taken up. In our termination timing research plots, the 2023 soybean stand counts suggest we may have another year of late rye termination causing yield drag, but it ain’t over til it’s over.

There were other issues from cover crops in 2022 as well. Overwintering cover crops provide an attractive egg laying site for migratory insects like black cutworm and true armyworm. When planting an overwintering cover crop it is important to remain diligent with insect monitoring so you can make insect management decisions in a timely manner in order to protect your cash crop. Cover crops can also act as a green bridge for other plant disease and insect issues. Terminating cover crops at or after planting of cash crop creates the greatest risk for these pest issues.

In the long-term, better soil structure from cover crops and reduced tillage can help hold water in the soil. We saw this at on-farm research sites in south-central MN in 2021, where “soil health” sites with a history of reduced or no tillage and some cover crop use had significantly more water deeper in the soil profile than “conventional” plots with more tillage (Fig 2). This is one of the big goals of incorporating cover crops into the cropping system, and the key is to manage them so as not to let agronomic issues in the short-term spoil the potential for long-term benefits.

Figure 2: Growing season average soil moisture in on-farm research plots in south-central MN, 2021 and 2022. Lighter colors represent samples taken after a rain, darker colors are samples taken before a rain.

Figure 2: Growing season average soil moisture in on-farm research plots in south-central MN, 2021 and 2022. Lighter colors represent samples taken after a rain, darker colors are samples taken before a rain. 

Can we avoid these yield hits going forward?

We don’t have a research-based biomass threshold for when we expect rye to pull yield from soybeans. We let our cover crops grow huge for research purposes, but we would NOT recommend this in your fields. While you may not get much weed control benefit from terminating a cover crop early, terminating at the boot stage, or around 500 lbs/ac biomass (Fig 3), should provide erosion control, nutrient uptake, soil structure and biological benefits. (Research from Wisconsin shows that 500 lbs/ac of biomass shouldn’t affect the N available for corn as it breaks down either.)

Figure 3: Examples of 500 lbs/ac biomass, left, and 1,000 lbs/ac biomass, right.

Figure 3: Examples of 500 lbs/ac biomass, left, and 1,000 lbs/ac biomass, right. 

Of course, none of us can predict how much rain we’re going to get in a growing season. But if you’re going into the spring with a bit of a soil water deficit, it’s a good idea to be especially conservative and terminate cover crops earlier. Research from South Dakota found that corn yields after cover crops were significantly lower than without cover crops only when growing season precipitation was less than 30” (Fig 4 - Karki). So, if you are lucky to get cover crops up in a dry fall, make sure you keep an eye on spring precipitation accumulation! If you started the year with a soil moisture deficit, terminate your cover crop early.

Figure 4: On-farm research in South Dakota found corn yield usually didn’t change after cover crops at 62% of site-years (13 out of 21). The 38% of site-years (8 of 21) where yield declined after cover crops were all when precipitation was less than 30 inches between August when cover crops were planted and August of the following (corn harvest) year. Data from Bielenberg et al.

Figure 4: On-farm research in South Dakota found corn yield usually didn’t change after cover crops at 62% of site-years (13 out of 21). The 38% of site-years (8 of 21) where yield declined after cover crops were all when precipitation was less than 30 inches between August when cover crops were planted and August of the following (corn harvest) year. Data from Bielenberg et al.

Source : umn.edu

Trending Video

Nitrogen Management Solution

Video: Nitrogen Management Solution

Nowadays farmers are doing their best to raise more crops with fewer inputs. That includes using the right amount of nitrogen. However, determining optimal applications can be complicated and lead to wasteful application and nitrate runoff. That dilemma drew UNL grad student Jackson Stansell to help create a better nitrogen management solution.