Farms.com Home   Ag Industry News

Supporting good dogs in agriculture

Supporting good dogs in agriculture

A recently introduced bill would provide permanent authorization for the National Detector Dog Training Center

By Diego Flammini
Staff Writer
Farms.com

A piece of bipartisan legislation introduced in the senate in March would support four-legged workers who use their noses to keep U.S. agriculture safe.

Senators Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) and Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) tabled the Beagle Brigade Act on March 9.

The bill would provide permanent authorization for the USDA’s National Detector Dog Training Centre in Newman, Ga.

The center trains dogs, mostly beagles, for 13 weeks to detect illegal food, pests and diseases, and prevent those from entering the U.S.

Currently, the center isn’t authorized by Congress, relying instead on USDA user fees. This can lead to inconsistent funding.

In 2017, the USDA estimated invasive pests costs the U.S. about $120 billion each year in damages to agriculture, the environment and native species.

Passing this bill is important to safeguarding the U.S. ag sector, Senator Ernst said.

“Iowa farmers know that viruses like avian influenza and African Swine Fever have the power to devastate our agriculture industry, so we must do everything in our power to keep these diseases out of our farms and fields,” she said in a statement.

These dogs have helped keep the U.S. ag sector safe in recent years.

In January 2023, for example, a beagle named Harrie sniffed out luggage at Philadelphia International Airport with nearly 17 pounds of citrus and another six mounts of persimmons.

In November 2022, a beagle named Mox sniffed out a giant African snail arriving from Nigeria.

And in October 2018, a beagle named Hardy found a roasted pig’s head in a bag arriving at the Hartsfield-Jackson airport from Ecuador.

Industry groups support the Beagle Brigade Act.

Keeping livestock and plants free of foreign diseases is important for the health of U.S. farms, said Doug Chapin, chairman of the Michigan Milk Producers Association.

“Michigan’s dairy farmers work hard to care for herds and protect them from harm, and we fully support this effort to prevent foreign animal diseases from entering the U.S.,” he said in a statement.

The National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) supports the bill and wants it passed quickly.

“As African swine fever continues to plague the Dominican Republic and Haiti, strengthening early detection capabilities at our U.S. borders is more important than ever,” said Terry Wolters, president of the NPPC.


Trending Video

Wheat Yields in USA and China Threatened by Heat Waves Breaking Enzymes

Video: Wheat Yields in USA and China Threatened by Heat Waves Breaking Enzymes

A new peer reviewed study looks at the generally unrecognized risk of heat waves surpassing the threshold for enzyme damage in wheat.

Most studies that look at crop failure in the main food growing regions (breadbaskets of the planet) look at temperatures and droughts in the historical records to assess present day risk. Since the climate system has changed, these historical based risk analysis studies underestimate the present-day risks.

What this new research study does is generate an ensemble of plausible scenarios for the present climate in terms of temperatures and precipitation, and looks at how many of these plausible scenarios exceed the enzyme-breaking temperature of 32.8 C for wheat, and exceed the high stress yield reducing temperature of 27.8 C for wheat. Also, the study considers the possibility of a compounded failure with heat waves in both regions simultaneously, this greatly reducing global wheat supply and causing severe shortages.

Results show that the likelihood (risk) of wheat crop failure with a one-in-hundred likelihood in 1981 has in today’s climate become increased by 16x in the USA winter wheat crop (to one-in-six) and by 6x in northeast China (to one-in-sixteen).

The risks determined in this new paper are much greater than that obtained in previous work that determines risk by analyzing historical climate patterns.

Clearly, since the climate system is rapidly changing, we cannot assume stationarity and calculate risk probabilities like we did traditionally before.

We are essentially on a new planet, with a new climate regime, and have to understand that everything is different now.