Apply Pre-Harvest Glyphosate Only After Seed Moisture Drops Below 30%

Aug 12, 2011

Apply Pre-Harvest Glyphosate Only After Seed Moisture Drops Below 30%

Growers considering a pre-harvest glyphosate cannot apply it to canola (RR or non-RR) until seed moisture drops to 30% or lower. This roughly coincides with 30% seed colour change. Spraying earlier raises the potential for glyphosate residue in seed. Pre-harvest glyphosate will kill green weeds and even out the crop for straight combining, but it can take up to 3 weeks to do its job under cool fall conditions.

But what if the grower hasn’t sprayed at all? Some growers fighting excess moisture are still trying to get their first glyphosate application on their Roundup Ready canola. They’ll now have to wait until after seed has less than 30% moisture — for the reasons stated above.

Glyphosate is not a desiccant. Glyphosate will even out the crop and allow weeds to die and dry naturally for easier straight combining, but it will not make the crop mature faster. Premature application of glyphosate will simply increase the risk of excess residues, which could impact acceptability of the crop in foreign markets, and terminate seed filling prematurely, resulting in shrunken seeds with higher green count. Click here for more on pre-harvest herbicide.

Cleavers. Some growers in eastern Saskatchewan who didn’t get a chance to spray through the growing season because of excess moisture are seeing very large cleavers poking up through the canopy. Pre-harvest glyphosate may stop a small proportion of seeds from reaching maturity, but many of the seeds are likely already mature enough to remain viable. Unfortunately it is likely too late to avoid issues with cleavers seeds in dockage or back on the ground after harvest.

Source: Canola Council of Canada

Video: How Can We Grow More Food With Less Impact?

For over two decades, Dr. Mitloehner has been at the forefront of research on how animal agriculture affects our air and our climate. With deep expertise in emissions and volatile organic compounds, his work initially focused on air quality in regions like California’s Central Valley—home to both the nation’s richest agricultural output and some of its poorest air quality.

In recent years, methane has taken center stage in climate discourse—not just scientifically, but politically. Once a topic reserved for technical discussions about manure management and feed efficiency, it has become a flashpoint in debates over sustainability, regulation, and even the legitimacy of livestock farming itself.

Dr. Frank Mitloehner, Professor and Air Quality Specialist with the CLEAR Center sits down with Associate Director for Communications at the CLEAR Center, Joe Proudman.