Farms.com Home   News

Canola Sector Responds to Chinese Tariffs on Canola Meal, Oil

China’s Ministry of Commerce has concluded its anti-discrimination investigation against Canada, launched in September 2024, in response to Canadian tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, steel, and aluminum. The result? A heavy blow to Canadian canola.

On March 20, 2025, China’s State Council Tariff Commission will impose a 100% tariff on Canadian canola oil and canola meal — along with several other agricultural commodities. The move effectively shuts the door to one of Canada’s most valuable export markets.

The tariffs are separate from China’s ongoing anti-dumping investigation into Canadian canola seed imports, but the impact is immediate and staggering. In 2024, China imported $918 million worth of Canadian canola meal (2 million metric tonnes) and $20.6 million worth of canola oil (15,351 metric tonnes). Combined, China’s appetite for Canadian canola was worth nearly $5 billion last year.

“New tariffs from China on Canadian canola oil and meal will have a devastating impact on canola farmers and the broader value chain at a time of increased trade and geopolitical uncertainty,” says Chris Davison, President & CEO of the Canola Council of Canada (CCC). “We urge the federal government to immediately engage with China to resolve this issue.”

The timing couldn’t be worse. Canadian canola farmers, who are just weeks away from planting, now face significant financial uncertainty.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

$400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Video: $400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Officials are forced to defend cutting a historic $3.8 million research farm while the government simultaneously funded an $8.5 million cricket factory that went bankrupt. Is this evidence of an incoherent spending strategy? Watch the full committee clash to see the government's official rationale.

A heated discussion erupts over the logic behind the government's cuts to AAFC research farms in Lacombe, Indian Head, and Quebec City. MPs question why core, decades-old scientific infrastructure is being deemed 'not core' while other, controversial programs were funded. The Deputy Minister is repeatedly pressed for the actual net savings of the decision versus the expense of relocating research programs.