Farms.com Home   News

Major Brewers Meet One-On-One With U.S. Barley Growers In Virtual Setting

Last week, barley growers from Idaho, Montana, North Dakota and Washington virtually met one-on-one with several Mexican brewers, who received an update on planting area, expected yield and crop conditions across the states.

Growers presented on the conditions of their crop, explaining they have been very pleased with recent rains that will secure a good crop. The brewers also heard broader outlooks for the season from state barley organization officials.

“Changes in personnel are common in the industry, so we need to frequently remind buyers that the Council is here to help them source high-quality barley,” said Javier Chavez, USGC senior marketing specialist in Mexico. “Brewers are also very interested in regular planting reports so they know what supply to expect and the impact it will have on prices.”

Barley demand in Mexico has increased significantly in recent years, and there is interest from brewers in the country to source barley from the U.S. and increase brewers’ current procurement programs by generating new forward-contracting relationships. This virtual education session helped buyers better understand the upcoming U.S. barley crop and its ability to supply their needs in 2025 and beyond.

Click here to see more...

Trending Video

$400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Video: $400m loss to save $3.8m? The real cost of closing Canada's research farms | Agri cmte, 10 Feb 2026

Officials are forced to defend cutting a historic $3.8 million research farm while the government simultaneously funded an $8.5 million cricket factory that went bankrupt. Is this evidence of an incoherent spending strategy? Watch the full committee clash to see the government's official rationale.

A heated discussion erupts over the logic behind the government's cuts to AAFC research farms in Lacombe, Indian Head, and Quebec City. MPs question why core, decades-old scientific infrastructure is being deemed 'not core' while other, controversial programs were funded. The Deputy Minister is repeatedly pressed for the actual net savings of the decision versus the expense of relocating research programs.