North Carolina’s Poultry Industry Surges, but at What Cost to Health and Environment?

Sep 23, 2024

By Will Atwater

The Northern Red Cardinal has worn the crown as North Carolina’s official bird for eight decades, but judging by the numbers in a new report, another bird is king.

In 2022 state poultry operations “housed”nearly 357 million chickens and turkeys, up from 250 million in 2007, according to data provided by the Environmental Working Group, an organization that does research to promote healthy living and healthy environments. The numbers reflect a 43 percent average increase across the state, solidifying broilers — chickens raised for meat production — and turkeys as the state’s top birds, economically speaking.

The organization used machine learning, a type of artificial intelligence, to analyze U.S. Department of Agriculture aerial imagery of poultry houses, the report states.

“We are a big animal agriculture state ranking very highly in turkeys, chickens and pork production,” said Steve Troxler, North Carolina agriculture commissioner, during an interview in August. He told a group of farmers gathered to discuss the threat of bird flu that North Carolina was now No. 1 in the country for overall poultry receipts.

North Carolina’s agricultural industry has become an economic juggernaut. The state’s farm cash receipts for 2022 totaled more than $16 billion, according to USDA data. Of that amount, livestock, dairy and poultry sales accounted for 74.3 percent of the receipts. Nationally, the state ranks fourth in broiler production, which contributed to the state’s $111 billion agricultural and agribusiness portfolio.

But there’s another side to this story.

“More than half of all new poultry appeared in just four counties out of 100,” said Al Rabine, a GIS analyst with the Environmental Working Group and co-author of the report. “The rapid growth of the industry there, and the resulting dense concentration of poultry operations, should raise alarm bells about residents’ health, drinking water and air quality.

As the state’s poultry production average rose, the Environmental Working Group reported that four counties experienced a 98 percent increase during that same period. Three of them—Sampson, Duplin, and Robeson—are in eastern North Carolina, which is also the center of the state’s hog industry.

The report also states that nearly 10 million hogs “were housed on factory farms in 2022.” This data is unwelcome news for those who live, worship and learn in homes, churches and schools near hog and poultry farms, which pose threats to the environment and human health.

Adverse effects

The poultry operations impact “air quality, water quality, land quality, in the communities that are having to deal with all this,” said Jeff Currie, the Lumber Riverkeeper. Part of that river runs through Robeson County and has been impaired by contaminants discharged in the river by industrial facilities.

“It’s kind of the same old story,” said Sherri White-Williamson, executive director of the Environmental Justice Community Action Network, a Sampson County-based environmental advocacy group. “The counties that are already overburdened with concentrated agricultural feeding operations and all the pollution and health issues associated with it just keep getting more.”

White-Williamson said people in these communities are exposed to air filled with particulate matter from periodic spraying of animal waste on agricultural fields and are likely to have contaminated drinking water wells. She added, “It’s discouraging, depressing [and] very concerning for the health of folks.”

A study, released on Dec. 1, 2022, found that 2 percent of North Carolina’s swine and poultry facilities are in or near floodplains, putting some drinking water sources at risk. Another study released in October 2022 found that pregnant women who live in communities near concentrated poultry feeding operations could experience adverse health outcomes, including preterm delivery and low birth weight.

A 2021 study found that North Carolina residents who live near concentrated agricultural feeding operations have a higher risk of dying from cardiovascular disease than those who don’t.

For those who live near, but are not benefiting economically from, these livestock facilities, the stakes seem to be getting higher.

A veiled industry

Some environmental advocates feel the Environmental Working Group report underestimates the number of birds housed in poultry operations between 2007 and 2022 and want to know more about the methodology used. However, they agree with the larger point raised by the study and alluded to by co-author Sarah Graddy, Environmental Working Group’s senior director of agriculture and climate change.

“This investigation fills in crucial information gaps about poultry factory farms in North Carolina,” Graddy said in a release. “We believe our work will help others determine these operations’ effects on people and the environment, but we also know that it’s no substitute for actual state oversight.”

Much of what environmentalists know about the location and status of the state’s poultry farms is gathered through aerial surveillance. Larry Baldwin and Rick Dove, along with their riverkeeper colleagues, have taken flights organized by SouthWings, an Asheville-based environmental advocacy organization. The aviation group arranges flights for environmentalists, riverkeepers, media members and government officials.

A network of volunteer pilots make it possible for watchdog groups to document industrial hog and poultry operations. In 2023, Dove told NC Health News that he, Baldwin and the state’s other riverkeepers had logged a combined total of nearly 5,000 hours in the air.

Surveillance flights have revealed such things as improperly stored poultry litter and much more. But because of North Carolina General Statute 106-24.1, which shields the Department of Agriculture from disclosing information about individual farm (poultry) operations, there is no accessible registry of poultry farms. The only way to compile an inventory and monitor operations is through flying over them and painstakingly counting each farm and chicken house.

Click here to see more...

Video: Season 7, Episode 1: Managing Risk and Seeing Opportunities in U.S. Pork Production

Today’s episode features three guests discussing the similarities and differences between pork production in the United States and Brazil, along with strategies for managing risk in today’s industry while recognizing and acting on opportunities. First, Dr. Anne Caroline de Lara, executive manager of live pig production at Seara Alimentos, a JBS company in Brazil, is joined by Dr. Matthew Turner, head of operations for JBS Live Pork. Together, they discuss how labor, climate and ventilation challenges vary between Brazil and the United States, while underscoring their shared commitment to raising healthy pigs. They also point to lessons producers in both countries can take from one another’s systems and on-farm experiences. Then, Brady Reicks, risk manager at Reicks View Farms, shares his perspective on risk management, drawing from his background in markets and his transition into farming. He discusses how protecting margins varies by operation and offers practical approaches producers can use to make marketing and business decisions with greater confidence rather than hesitation.

Both conversations were recorded at recent industry events focused on swine livability, including the International Conference on Pig Livability and Iowa Swine Day.