Home   News

Organic Grain, Soybean Study Establishes Early Production Recommendations

Organic Grain, Soybean Study Establishes Early Production Recommendations
By Kay Ledbetter
After one year of studying organic grain and soybean cropping systems, Texas A&M AgriLife scientists say they know more about what not to do moving forward.
Three Texas A&M researchers are using a $475,000 U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture grant to study organic grain and soybean cropping systems over a three-year period.
The project leaders are Dr. Nithya Rajan, a Texas A&M AgriLife Research crop physiologist; Dr. Muthu Bagavathiannan, AgriLife Research weed scientist; and Dr. Ronnie Schnell, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service cropping systems specialist – all in the Texas A&M department of soil and crop sciences in College Station.
Organic grain sorghum under conventional tillage planted in College Station.
Year one, they said, was a learning year, as there is very little information about organic farming in Texas both for researchers and producers.
“Producers in Texas interested in organic farming have limited information on best management practices, especially for large-scale grain production,” Rajan said. “Our goal is to identify organic cropping systems and management techniques for successful production of organic grain crops in Texas.”
Rajan said they will first identify species of cover crops and planting regimens. Other goals with this study include a greater understanding of the influence of organic management practices on nutrient cycling, greenhouse gas emissions, weed population dynamics, water-yield relations and soil health.
“We knew there would be challenges meeting the nutritional needs of the crop due to restrictions on nutrient sources in organic systems,” Schnell said. “We had a plan to use legume cover crops as a nitrogen source, but we struggled to get good production from these, and that snowballed into more problems.”
He said the timing of cover crop plantings was not optimum, and some of the cover crop species selected were not adapted to the production systems in the region.
“Cereal rye is not ideal for our systems here in Texas,” Schnell said. “When it began to grow and put on biomass, it was too late to plant grain crops and the ability to mechanically terminate the crop was reduced.
“We typically plant corn near the first of March, and sorghum and soybeans in late March. The rye didn’t mature until April, which ended up being competitive with the grain crops and became more like a weed.”
Hairy vetch also didn’t produce a lot of biomass on a timely basis, he said.
“Weed management was a big challenge,” Bagavathiannan said. “The cover crops provided some help in this respect, but because of a lack of good biomass production, they didn’t provide enough weed suppression.
“Inter-row cultivation was very effective for corn and grain sorghum,” he said. “No-till systems were the ones suffering the most with weed pressure. Johnsongrass is our No. 1 weed problem in the plots. Because they (Johnsongrass) are perennial, inclusion of more strategic tillage in the summer and fall is important for effective management of this species.”
Schnell said the second year of their NIFA grant study will shift cover crops, including alternative cereal crops and legumes, with the same goal of supplying nitrogen and providing weed control for the spring grain crops.
“We are going to try a spring wheat instead of cereal rye,” he said. “We are fall planting it in hopes that it will be nearing maturity when we need it, late winter, so we can successfully terminate it.
“We need a dense, mature biomass from cover crops to plant into during the spring,” Schnell said. “The cover crop biomass should compete with early season weeds, but not be actively growing at that point so that it doesn’t compete with the corn, sorghum and soybeans.”
Click here to see more...